The White House has found a novel way to ensure Donald Trump’s nominees ascend to power.

Federal judges in the Western District of Washington swore in former King County Superior Court Judge Roger Rogoff as U.S. attorney Wednesday morning. Within 54 minutes, Trump fired him.

The district’s 17 federal judges have been trying to find a replacement for Seattle’s First Assistant U.S. Attorney Neil Floyd, after Trump failed to formally nominate him. Floyd was appointed in October, though his name was never officially advanced to the Senate for consideration.

Federal law grants a district’s judges the power to appoint a U.S. attorney if the president and the acting attorney general fail to do so within 120 days, subsequently stonewalling the procedural Senate hearings.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Another step towards becoming an authoritarian dictatorship and still Americans do nothing.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 44 points 1 month ago (18 children)

    What should they realistically be doing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    And when CBP, the national guard, and police show up and shoot everyone when Trump declares martial law (you know, exactly what Trump wants before the midterms)? What then? I'm taking notes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The point is to show up in large enough numbers that it doesn't matter.

    Revolts aren't without risk, and typically bloody.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    I don't disagree. But people generally don't want bombs dropped on their heads and will avoid it until it becomes the final option. Until that time comes, small groups will be shot or imprisoned. Just like what happened in Texas last week. Just like what happened with BLM. There are countless examples of people rising against, only to be stomped because the fed arrives. Trump would love any excuse to fuck over the midterms, and would be happy to kill some left leaning opposition if given the chance.

    Further, the US is very spread out. The cities and urban areas are relatively easy to get together. It's everywhere else that needs the ability to join the crowd. It's not like Europe where it's fairly easy to travel around, unfortunately.

    If you want my thoughts on what we should do, it's to actually hurt what they care about most: their wallets. A general, nationwide strike would work well. However, to make it so people don't just starve to death, we need to set up a strike fund or food network. With that, the strike could last long enough to affect their bottom lines, and people would actually be willing to participate, knowing that their family won't starve to do it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    A general strike is more or less impossible in the US. It would need to be coordinated across multiple key industries in every state, you'd need basically every shipping company and truck driver on board, and it would have to last for weeks. It's simply not a thing that can actually realistically happen in the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    No-one said the revolution would be easy, immediate, nor convenient.

    You get the treatment you tolerate.

    Prepare accordingly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (18 children)

    That is exactly my point. People outside of the US are expecting it to be easy and want immediate results. It won't be easy nor will it be immediate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Yeah we are actually just expecting it to be done, as pointed out elsewhere.

    This is after a trial run was given and it’s due to a lack of desire to vote. Selfishness.

    Americans ask a shitload of undeserved understanding about this and expect a pass here they wouldn’t give others.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (17 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    The national strike is the one. If it’s just the cities that’s more than enough to grind the wheels down. The sooner the better, the larger the more effective. I reckon two weeks to a month would see it out. Congress would move pretty quickly once everything is starved.

    It’ll involve hardship and a willingness to do this without logistical coordination though.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    A national shutdown.

    Every direction now involves hardship, because there’s no more fair elections till this regime is removed. Peaceful shutdown is the easiest and least bloody.

    They failed at the easy option, twice. Running won’t help either because we can’t stop it and it’s not our job to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    People in the USA can't afford to lose everything by missing even a week of work. I'm dead serious. If you do a shutdown, you will get fired. If you get fired, you will lose your access to healthcare, assuming you have any. There is no housing protection and no food safety net in place to help people who commit to a cause.

    Now, let's say none of that mattered. Something close to 2/3rds of Americans cannot cover an emergent $500 expenditure. To fly from the west coast to DC in order to protest costs about $1000. Driving across the country costs even more.

    Now, let's say none of that mattered. The USA has about 2 million of its citizens in prison at any given time. This doesn't account for the implementation of concentration camps both throughout the USA and abroad to hold people detained by ICE, including American citizens, some of whom have been deported to countries that they have never been to.

    Now, let's say none of that mattered. Slavery is still 100% legal in the USA as punishment for a crime under the 13th amendment. The cool thing about slaves is that you can assign them to do whatever. Maybe you work a call center for a corporation, maybe you get sent out to fight wildland forest fires, or even disaster relief cleanup. For those that are compensated, the average across state rate is $0.62 per hour. If you refuse to participate, the consequences start with the removal privileges, escalate to solitary confinement, and eventually you get transferred to a higher security facility.

    Now, let's say none of that mattered. While in prison you will be exposed to abuses including but not limited to the following: physical violence, sexual assault, excessive force, and systemic retaliation.

    All of this can happen as a result of 1 serious offense, where the seriousness of the offense is determined largely by the current presidential administration. A typical felony case in the US will cost you about $5,000 unless you go with a public defender. A public defender still costs money, but the cost is less and their services are funded through a sliding scale fee based on the defendant’s income, plus court filing fees. While there is no difference in the severity of the outcome of provided by a public defender, there is a difference in the timeline, with public defender caseloads requiring longer timelines to get before the court. It's not a huge difference, but remember where you would be waiting it out.

    So, as a parent in the USA I have to decide if I want to protest against the government. This is an unseen entity on the other side of the country. My job is dope, so I could actually do this. I could buy a ticket, take the time off work, travel to Washington DC, protest, get arrested, pay the money to expedite my trial and return to my family in, let's say, a calendar year, during which time I would lose my job, income, and healthcare benefits and my daughter cannot go to college or really count on any type of inheritance. I have to decide if that is a price that I am willing to pay. Given that we live in a high surveillance police state, the odds are overwhelmingly in favor of me being caught. This also assumes that the federal government doesn't gun me down in the streets, which is now a real possibility.

    Or I can do nothing, hope that the old fucks in government die off (they are all very old), and generally live a decent life. I know that the government has no qualms about destroying my life or those of my fellow citizens on a large-scale basis. It's seriously not worth the risk. Does that make me complicit in the atrocities committed by my government both at home and abroad? Sure does. Does it spare me being the victim of those atrocities personally? Sure does.

    This isn't written as an excuse for the average American's behavior. It is written to provide some insight into why the average American doesn't take up arms or even publicly resist the government. The average American is scared of losing access to the incredible amount of wealth and privilege that we enjoy. We know that it is all built on outsourced oppression. As long as we don't make waves, we can enjoy access to shitty food, mass produced culture, and use internet filters to block out the bad news that we don't want to see.

    Where the real money is, in terms of political change in the USA, is lone wolf violence. Not the fake stuff coordinated by the President, but actual nut-job, mass-shooting, cars-into-crowds, crazy home invasion political action. Since I am a regular-ass human being, none of that is reasonable to me. But the other side has people who are sure as shit willing to throw their lives away on a murder charge because they believe, rightfully so, that they have a non-zero chance at a political pardon followed by a boost in income from becoming a minor celebrity to their cause, and literally no access to mental healthcare or opposing viewpoints. Even if my fake-ass "left" political party was in power, I couldn't get away with that.

    So, yeah, that was off-the-cuff and a bit of a ramble, but I hope that it provided some insight to, without condoning, the behavior of the typical American citizen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Fucking protest at the very least. When other countries try authoritarian shit you have millions of people protesting in the capital for days on end.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (19 children)

    We've been protesting weekly in Minnesota for half a year now. Since the ICE stuff started.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    From the scarce videos I can find the weekly protests they appear to be in the order of dozens of people, not the hundreds of thousands or millions that are necessary to even have a chance at making a difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (18 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (8 children)

    Edit: I'm clearly going to get down voted into oblivion, but that doesn't really matter. What does matter is that if you are a US citizen, protest AFTER the upcoming election if you are going to do it. Especially if you are in a "red" state We need to remove as much of the veneer of legitimate as possible from this administration. If you protest now, there is a risk your vote gets removed. Don't listen to dumb fucks from other countries who have no concept of the social issues of the US. They don't even understand the moral, economic, and social issues around tipping. Their opinions are invalid. VOTE. It probably won't work, but we can always protest etc. After. This act now right before midterms bs is just ignorance or psy-ops.

    Original post below: He's doing this to create civil unrest so he can declare martial law. You are suggesting people take action that aids that goal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Ah yes, some 5d chess move to invoke martial law. From the same guy that has already deployed the national guard and has his goons shooting people daily.

    HA!

    What a shit eating people, you are already at that stage, this administration has clearly shown they need nothing based in reality to do anything. They just do it, and say things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    Violent revolution is the only answer, but we won't do it. So my plan b is to move. Doesn't solve the world crisis the US is causing, doesn't solve the rise of fascism, but it at least gives me some breathing room to reset and regroup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    No it’s not

    Peaceful shutdown is the only answer. You have to grind the wheels to a halt and force those influential people who actually can act, act.

    That’s the only way now.

    Edit: no point running, we can’t stop it, and you brought this on yourselves. We had no say in this, why should we bail you out? Stay and help fix it please

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (11 replies)
  • load more comments (14 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (25 children)

    Similar things could be said about the UK.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Except things are way worse in the US than in the UK (as bad as they are there).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (24 replies)