▲ 414 ▼ Family in Georgia says they're forced to sell home to help power data centers (www.msn.com) submitted 1 month ago by FirmDistribution@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 75 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (1 child) Lucifer! No compensation for that?! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (3 children) They need to sue right away, eminent domain without compensation is a violation of the Fifth Amendment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (2 children) I'm sure some young couple in rural Georgia that just made the biggest purchase of their entire life will jump right on that. I'm sure they've got a huge reserve fund for legal expenses set aside. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Absolutely this. While lawsuits seem to drive the American economy, maybe we don't all have a lawsuit fund to go alongside our medical expense account, because we're too busy paying for housing and heat and light and food and gas. ...and maybe we shouldn't feel like the credible threat of a lawsuit is the only thing keeping people in line. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) Some lawyers work on commission! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] xilophor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* Like AstralPath said, the take a fairly large portion of the final payout, but more than that, when they are working on commission, they pay for all the costs, which isn't very tempting. For most laywers, if not all, working on commision, the have to be fairly certain of two things: They have a good chance of winning the case Their portion payout will cover (and preferably more than cover) the costs they put into it Unfortunately, not both are true that often. So, many people are just left screwed over with no way to recover anything permalink fedilink source parent [–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (3 children) True, but your settlement to recoup costs gets eaten by the lawyer, likely to leave you with very little at the end of the day. So the defendant gets a slap on the wrist, you get a pittance and you're still fucked. I'd sue no matter what just out of principle, but just sayin' lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago I'd rather have justice and $1 than no justice and no dollar permalink fedilink source parent [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) In a sane world, the company you sue would have to pay your legal expenses in addition to the compensation they owe you... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago You can make that happen, but you have to win first. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Correct me if I'm wrong but there is a certain % they are allowed to take if they win the case. Them taking it pro bono should not alter that %. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago Depends very much on the type of litigation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago I’m sure they’re getting compensation. The question is always whether it’s fair compensation. I’m sure they’re claiming they’re just using an easement on the back of the property while they’re saying our entire lives are here and we don’t want to live under power lines permalink fedilink source parent [–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago They typically condemn the land before using eminent domain. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (3 children) They need to sue right away, eminent domain without compensation is a violation of the Fifth Amendment. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (2 children) I'm sure some young couple in rural Georgia that just made the biggest purchase of their entire life will jump right on that. I'm sure they've got a huge reserve fund for legal expenses set aside. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Absolutely this. While lawsuits seem to drive the American economy, maybe we don't all have a lawsuit fund to go alongside our medical expense account, because we're too busy paying for housing and heat and light and food and gas. ...and maybe we shouldn't feel like the credible threat of a lawsuit is the only thing keeping people in line. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) Some lawyers work on commission! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] xilophor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* Like AstralPath said, the take a fairly large portion of the final payout, but more than that, when they are working on commission, they pay for all the costs, which isn't very tempting. For most laywers, if not all, working on commision, the have to be fairly certain of two things: They have a good chance of winning the case Their portion payout will cover (and preferably more than cover) the costs they put into it Unfortunately, not both are true that often. So, many people are just left screwed over with no way to recover anything permalink fedilink source parent [–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (3 children) True, but your settlement to recoup costs gets eaten by the lawyer, likely to leave you with very little at the end of the day. So the defendant gets a slap on the wrist, you get a pittance and you're still fucked. I'd sue no matter what just out of principle, but just sayin' lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago I'd rather have justice and $1 than no justice and no dollar permalink fedilink source parent [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) In a sane world, the company you sue would have to pay your legal expenses in addition to the compensation they owe you... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago You can make that happen, but you have to win first. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Correct me if I'm wrong but there is a certain % they are allowed to take if they win the case. Them taking it pro bono should not alter that %. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago Depends very much on the type of litigation. permalink fedilink source parent [–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago I’m sure they’re getting compensation. The question is always whether it’s fair compensation. I’m sure they’re claiming they’re just using an easement on the back of the property while they’re saying our entire lives are here and we don’t want to live under power lines permalink fedilink source parent [–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago They typically condemn the land before using eminent domain. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (2 children) I'm sure some young couple in rural Georgia that just made the biggest purchase of their entire life will jump right on that. I'm sure they've got a huge reserve fund for legal expenses set aside. /s permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Absolutely this. While lawsuits seem to drive the American economy, maybe we don't all have a lawsuit fund to go alongside our medical expense account, because we're too busy paying for housing and heat and light and food and gas. ...and maybe we shouldn't feel like the credible threat of a lawsuit is the only thing keeping people in line. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) Some lawyers work on commission! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] xilophor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* Like AstralPath said, the take a fairly large portion of the final payout, but more than that, when they are working on commission, they pay for all the costs, which isn't very tempting. For most laywers, if not all, working on commision, the have to be fairly certain of two things: They have a good chance of winning the case Their portion payout will cover (and preferably more than cover) the costs they put into it Unfortunately, not both are true that often. So, many people are just left screwed over with no way to recover anything permalink fedilink source parent [–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (3 children) True, but your settlement to recoup costs gets eaten by the lawyer, likely to leave you with very little at the end of the day. So the defendant gets a slap on the wrist, you get a pittance and you're still fucked. I'd sue no matter what just out of principle, but just sayin' lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago I'd rather have justice and $1 than no justice and no dollar permalink fedilink source parent [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) In a sane world, the company you sue would have to pay your legal expenses in addition to the compensation they owe you... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago You can make that happen, but you have to win first. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Correct me if I'm wrong but there is a certain % they are allowed to take if they win the case. Them taking it pro bono should not alter that %. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago Depends very much on the type of litigation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Absolutely this. While lawsuits seem to drive the American economy, maybe we don't all have a lawsuit fund to go alongside our medical expense account, because we're too busy paying for housing and heat and light and food and gas. ...and maybe we shouldn't feel like the credible threat of a lawsuit is the only thing keeping people in line. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) Some lawyers work on commission! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] xilophor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* Like AstralPath said, the take a fairly large portion of the final payout, but more than that, when they are working on commission, they pay for all the costs, which isn't very tempting. For most laywers, if not all, working on commision, the have to be fairly certain of two things: They have a good chance of winning the case Their portion payout will cover (and preferably more than cover) the costs they put into it Unfortunately, not both are true that often. So, many people are just left screwed over with no way to recover anything permalink fedilink source parent [–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (3 children) True, but your settlement to recoup costs gets eaten by the lawyer, likely to leave you with very little at the end of the day. So the defendant gets a slap on the wrist, you get a pittance and you're still fucked. I'd sue no matter what just out of principle, but just sayin' lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago I'd rather have justice and $1 than no justice and no dollar permalink fedilink source parent [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) In a sane world, the company you sue would have to pay your legal expenses in addition to the compensation they owe you... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago You can make that happen, but you have to win first. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Correct me if I'm wrong but there is a certain % they are allowed to take if they win the case. Them taking it pro bono should not alter that %. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago Depends very much on the type of litigation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] xilophor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* Like AstralPath said, the take a fairly large portion of the final payout, but more than that, when they are working on commission, they pay for all the costs, which isn't very tempting. For most laywers, if not all, working on commision, the have to be fairly certain of two things: They have a good chance of winning the case Their portion payout will cover (and preferably more than cover) the costs they put into it Unfortunately, not both are true that often. So, many people are just left screwed over with no way to recover anything permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (3 children) True, but your settlement to recoup costs gets eaten by the lawyer, likely to leave you with very little at the end of the day. So the defendant gets a slap on the wrist, you get a pittance and you're still fucked. I'd sue no matter what just out of principle, but just sayin' lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago I'd rather have justice and $1 than no justice and no dollar permalink fedilink source parent [–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) In a sane world, the company you sue would have to pay your legal expenses in addition to the compensation they owe you... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago You can make that happen, but you have to win first. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Correct me if I'm wrong but there is a certain % they are allowed to take if they win the case. Them taking it pro bono should not alter that %. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago Depends very much on the type of litigation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago I'd rather have justice and $1 than no justice and no dollar permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) In a sane world, the company you sue would have to pay your legal expenses in addition to the compensation they owe you... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago You can make that happen, but you have to win first. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago You can make that happen, but you have to win first. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Correct me if I'm wrong but there is a certain % they are allowed to take if they win the case. Them taking it pro bono should not alter that %. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago Depends very much on the type of litigation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago Depends very much on the type of litigation. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago I’m sure they’re getting compensation. The question is always whether it’s fair compensation. I’m sure they’re claiming they’re just using an easement on the back of the property while they’re saying our entire lives are here and we don’t want to live under power lines permalink fedilink source parent
[–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago They typically condemn the land before using eminent domain. permalink fedilink source parent