I struggle with this a bit. Even if the book is 3.98 stars, i view that as not passing lowest bar. I consider most 4 stars books to not be there time, but rather the number of stars is how i filter out bad books
Also, how do you use your stars? Do you change your rating often?
For me, it generally goes like this:
- 1 Star -Either its so bad that its offense or i dnf it
- 2 Stars - Either bad or mediocre, not really work any time
- 3 Stars - An okay book with a couple of redeeming points
- 4 Stars - A great book with some flaws that bother me
- 5 Stars - An excellent book, i am jumping in my sits.
I'm a little confused, are you asking if, after reading a book, many of them are less than 4 stars on my own scale? Or are you asking if I use someone else's rating to pick the books I read, and avoid ones less than 4 stars?
I mostly read SF, with some fantasy, and not much else. The core of my reading list is made up from books that have been finalists for the major SF/F awards (Hugo, Nebula, Arthur C Clark), sequels to those, and books recommended by other sources that I respect a lot (e.g., Locus Mag reviews, recommendations by authors who I really like, etc.).
So those probably translate into 4 or 5 star ratings from external sources, though none of them use a rating system like that. I very, very rarely end up hating the books I end up reading, though some I don't really like a lot, even though they were critically acclaimed.
You can see the books I've read in 2025, with links to prior years, in this post.
Yeah. I just added the question of how You use your stars as a bonus.
Oh, okay, makes sense. I avoid stars personally. I just say if I liked a book and why - you can see from my link if you look at a few.