434
Could any political messaging analysts please help us decipher what this means (thelemmy.club)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.ca
270 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 3 months ago (21 children)

Good thing the Republicans hated Charlie Kirk then! Thanks for the favor!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
    •
  • [+] -10 points 3 months ago (20 children)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    Wow, your first few comments I thought you were just trying to be funny. Thanks for letting us know you’re actually just a piece of shit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    I was being funny. Then for whatever reason people decided to turn it serious because we can't joke in this country anymore and if anyone says anything that threatens the echo chamber accepted mentality we must attack. Right? I mean it would be crazy to have an intelligent discussion or just enjoy the humor of something

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Your first few were funny, I’ll give you that.

    Your comment I replied to just spouted conservative lies, and is used to attack a specific minority. It wasn’t funny, and it wasn’t a joke.

    Please tell me how blaming everything on trans folk is entertaining an intelligent discussion. I’d love to hear the mental hoops you jump through to justify your bigotry.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    If you have to lie to make your point then you don't have a very good point. I certainly did not blame everything on trans people. That's a gross exaggeration to say the least. It is absolutely true whether you like it or not that Charlie Kirk was shot by a person because he was angry about what Charlie Kirk had said about trans people because his lover is a trans person. That is an objective verifiable fact. And it got brought up because somebody made a comment about how great it was that Charlie Kirk got shot and killed.

    So here you are giving me a hard time because I said something that was true and you're not admonishing the person who literally said that the murder of a human being was a great thing. "thanks for the favor". That's not offensive to you but the idea that I actually said that a trans person was involved in that shooting is something so horrific you have to take the time to chastise me

    Seriously are you even listening to yourself? The bigotry and hatred here is on your side of the fence not mine. What I said was absolutely objectively true but it wasn't response to somebody who was saying something an order of magnitude more horrible your problem is with me and not that person.

    May I assume from that that you are in support of shooting public figures that say things you don't like? Or killing democratically elected presidents because you didn't win the vote? You seem to feel those are lesser issues than me actually accurately pointing out that a trans person was directly involved in this shooting and that the reason the shooting happened was because of a trans person

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You said something to the effect of “trans people are maniacs killing people with guns”. Don’t remember the correct wording since your comment was rightfully deleted.

    I’m give you a hard time because you said one thing that was a fact, and then followed up with a gross generalization. This is how you guys operate. Say one fact, followed by a bunch of bullshit, and then you get upset when people call you out, saying “I was only stating a fact”.

    I’m being a bigot by not tolerating your behaviour?

    You’re fucking insane my guy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago

    I said nothing at all to the effect that trans people are maniacs killing people with guns. One person said thank god charlie Kirk was killed they did us a real favor. and he thanked 'Republicans' for it. I pointed out the kid was raised republican so he knew how to shoot, but the reason for the shooting was his trans lover roommate, not republicans.

    And of course you have to remember it differently and lie about what I said rather than deal with the fact that what I said was the absolute truth. Neither of those parties disagrees with that.

    You're being a bigot by pretending my behavior is something that never happened. You're living your life based on hatred. I was joking around until somebody decided that it was okay to say they were thrilled about the public murder of someone just because they said something that they disagree with. But you're fine with that, You're not commenting on the person who said that you're angry that I pointed it out. What does that say about you

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    I was being funny. Then for whatever reason people decided to turn it serious because we can't joke in this country anymore...

    Schrödinger’s bigot!

    If you didn't believe what you're saying you would have taken accountability for the poor taste and apologized by now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Why would I do that? I haven't heard anyone else apologize for their poor taste or anything and if anything you're Setting that bar. You don't have any problem with someone cheering the murder of an innocent civilian at the hands of a deranged lunatic because he didn't like what the guy said about trans people. But you think I should apologize

    Kid your moral compass isn't just broken it's been crushed. What I said was true. But don't come and talk to me about whether it's moral or not well at the same time you're supporting people cheering for the murder of innocent people. You have no moral High Ground to stand on in the slightest

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (3 children)

    You're unhinged. Your actual views are clear, and contrary to the social contract of a peaceful civilization. You're getting ratioed into oblivion across this entire thread and not one person has agreed with anything you've said.

    No one cares what you have to say, and your scrambling to rationalize and justify your heinous opinions would seem to indicate you need some serious introspection and likely some psychiatric care.

    You will receive no further replies from me; you're dangerous and I don't entertain the type of rhetoric you're promoting.

    There is still time to work on improving your character.

    Do better.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    There are lots of times in history where one person said something that was true even though the people around them demanded otherwise. Galileo would never have done his work if he worried about what some loser in the public sphere who is misinformed and misguided by ideology thought.

    I don't really care if I received her further place from you. You're the kind of person that is literally standing up for murdering people. And then you're trying to tell me I'm the problem

    Cry harder kid

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    We don't know the shooting had anything to do with someone else being trans. Even if everyone didn't already know it was Israel, one could as easily assume the shooter hated pedophiles or rapists. Maybe he hates con men. Who even said it had anything to do with trans people?

    Israel did it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [+] -6 points 3 months ago

    We absolutely do. He's admitted it and so has his trans Girlfriend whom he was roommates with at University. The moment someone tells people like you the truth they call it bigotry

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Why is it always the baby accounts spewing the most unhinged, idiotic fuckass takes 😆

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I suppose a personal attack is all you have if you can't Refute the facts

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    "Baby account" means new account. That's not a personal attack, it's just reality.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago

    spewing the most unhinged, idiotic fuckass takes

    LOLOL but it's absolutely hilarious that you're trying to pretend the 'baby account' part was what i was referring to 😁😁

    Here's a good rule in life kid. If you have to lie to make your point you don't have a very good point

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent