dogdeanafternoon comments on Could any political messaging analysts please help us decipher what this means

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Your first few were funny, I’ll give you that.

Your comment I replied to just spouted conservative lies, and is used to attack a specific minority. It wasn’t funny, and it wasn’t a joke.

Please tell me how blaming everything on trans folk is entertaining an intelligent discussion. I’d love to hear the mental hoops you jump through to justify your bigotry.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] Foxer@lemmy.ca -4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If you have to lie to make your point then you don't have a very good point. I certainly did not blame everything on trans people. That's a gross exaggeration to say the least. It is absolutely true whether you like it or not that Charlie Kirk was shot by a person because he was angry about what Charlie Kirk had said about trans people because his lover is a trans person. That is an objective verifiable fact. And it got brought up because somebody made a comment about how great it was that Charlie Kirk got shot and killed.

So here you are giving me a hard time because I said something that was true and you're not admonishing the person who literally said that the murder of a human being was a great thing. "thanks for the favor". That's not offensive to you but the idea that I actually said that a trans person was involved in that shooting is something so horrific you have to take the time to chastise me

Seriously are you even listening to yourself? The bigotry and hatred here is on your side of the fence not mine. What I said was absolutely objectively true but it wasn't response to somebody who was saying something an order of magnitude more horrible your problem is with me and not that person.

May I assume from that that you are in support of shooting public figures that say things you don't like? Or killing democratically elected presidents because you didn't win the vote? You seem to feel those are lesser issues than me actually accurately pointing out that a trans person was directly involved in this shooting and that the reason the shooting happened was because of a trans person

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] dogdeanafternoon@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

You said something to the effect of “trans people are maniacs killing people with guns”. Don’t remember the correct wording since your comment was rightfully deleted.

I’m give you a hard time because you said one thing that was a fact, and then followed up with a gross generalization. This is how you guys operate. Say one fact, followed by a bunch of bullshit, and then you get upset when people call you out, saying “I was only stating a fact”.

I’m being a bigot by not tolerating your behaviour?

You’re fucking insane my guy.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Foxer@lemmy.ca -3 points 3 months ago

I said nothing at all to the effect that trans people are maniacs killing people with guns. One person said thank god charlie Kirk was killed they did us a real favor. and he thanked 'Republicans' for it. I pointed out the kid was raised republican so he knew how to shoot, but the reason for the shooting was his trans lover roommate, not republicans.

And of course you have to remember it differently and lie about what I said rather than deal with the fact that what I said was the absolute truth. Neither of those parties disagrees with that.

You're being a bigot by pretending my behavior is something that never happened. You're living your life based on hatred. I was joking around until somebody decided that it was okay to say they were thrilled about the public murder of someone just because they said something that they disagree with. But you're fine with that, You're not commenting on the person who said that you're angry that I pointed it out. What does that say about you

permalink

fedilink

source

parent