▲ 254 ▼ Russia and China Develop Joint Plan to Counter Starlink; It Involves Physical Destruction of Satellites (militarnyi.com) submitted 1 month ago by EatingOnions@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world 84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ooh I'm actually all for this! Destroy ALL the satellites! permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tiral@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) The problem is they won't clean anything up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago (1 child) Clean what up? The debris that burns up in the atmosphere? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) I suggest reading the Kessler syndrome article on Wikipedia. The short of it is that not all that debris is expected to come down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Eventually it will all come down, but it will take a very long time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Fair. I probably should have written "not all of it will immediately deorbit." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Oh yeah I was being pedantic. I knew what you meant! permalink fedilink source parent [–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) The Kessler syndrome was a proposed scenario, not a scientific study. A hypothetical. This article is about countering Starlink. Starlink satellites are in such low orbit, they de-orbit by themselves and fall back and burn up in the atmosphere very quickly if they don't correct their orbit regularly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago And the (heavily editorialized) news headline was to do it explosively. Not sure where you and I are disconnecting here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) The problem is they won't clean anything up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago (1 child) Clean what up? The debris that burns up in the atmosphere? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) I suggest reading the Kessler syndrome article on Wikipedia. The short of it is that not all that debris is expected to come down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Eventually it will all come down, but it will take a very long time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Fair. I probably should have written "not all of it will immediately deorbit." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Oh yeah I was being pedantic. I knew what you meant! permalink fedilink source parent [–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) The Kessler syndrome was a proposed scenario, not a scientific study. A hypothetical. This article is about countering Starlink. Starlink satellites are in such low orbit, they de-orbit by themselves and fall back and burn up in the atmosphere very quickly if they don't correct their orbit regularly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago And the (heavily editorialized) news headline was to do it explosively. Not sure where you and I are disconnecting here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago (1 child) Clean what up? The debris that burns up in the atmosphere? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) I suggest reading the Kessler syndrome article on Wikipedia. The short of it is that not all that debris is expected to come down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Eventually it will all come down, but it will take a very long time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Fair. I probably should have written "not all of it will immediately deorbit." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Oh yeah I was being pedantic. I knew what you meant! permalink fedilink source parent [–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) The Kessler syndrome was a proposed scenario, not a scientific study. A hypothetical. This article is about countering Starlink. Starlink satellites are in such low orbit, they de-orbit by themselves and fall back and burn up in the atmosphere very quickly if they don't correct their orbit regularly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago And the (heavily editorialized) news headline was to do it explosively. Not sure where you and I are disconnecting here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children) I suggest reading the Kessler syndrome article on Wikipedia. The short of it is that not all that debris is expected to come down. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Eventually it will all come down, but it will take a very long time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Fair. I probably should have written "not all of it will immediately deorbit." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Oh yeah I was being pedantic. I knew what you meant! permalink fedilink source parent [–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) The Kessler syndrome was a proposed scenario, not a scientific study. A hypothetical. This article is about countering Starlink. Starlink satellites are in such low orbit, they de-orbit by themselves and fall back and burn up in the atmosphere very quickly if they don't correct their orbit regularly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago And the (heavily editorialized) news headline was to do it explosively. Not sure where you and I are disconnecting here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Eventually it will all come down, but it will take a very long time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Fair. I probably should have written "not all of it will immediately deorbit." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Oh yeah I was being pedantic. I knew what you meant! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Fair. I probably should have written "not all of it will immediately deorbit." permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Oh yeah I was being pedantic. I knew what you meant! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Oh yeah I was being pedantic. I knew what you meant! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) The Kessler syndrome was a proposed scenario, not a scientific study. A hypothetical. This article is about countering Starlink. Starlink satellites are in such low orbit, they de-orbit by themselves and fall back and burn up in the atmosphere very quickly if they don't correct their orbit regularly. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] deltapi@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago And the (heavily editorialized) news headline was to do it explosively. Not sure where you and I are disconnecting here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago And the (heavily editorialized) news headline was to do it explosively. Not sure where you and I are disconnecting here. permalink fedilink source parent