you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

More specific would be "historical polygamy from Biblical times." Like, "kings and stuff did it back then."

Anybody who thinks that means the Bible is for this need only look at the actual Biblical accounts of the many kings therein: Occasionally wise, fatally flawed, ultimately lonely and empty despite having the world of men in their hand.

It is not the role of man, to rule over other men (or women).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment