you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 months ago* (29 children)

Worse than every landlord I've had since 2010 how?

Fuck it, let em. I don't own shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (28 children)

    Do you have kids or any dependents by chance?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (27 children)

    I don't own any children.

    I think I'd prefer to be evicted by the indigenous ous people William Mulholland fucked out of water for kind of no reason a century ago than blackrock capital. Again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (26 children)

    I mean dependents could also be a grandparent you're caring for or a disabled sibling and so on and I'm not sure I would say people own their dependents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (25 children)

    Still. Fuck off with your racist bullshit. I've had a community before. I've cared about people. Some of them were the people you're fucking talking about. You know they're just, like, around? I could even be one of them! You would never know! Sorry if that complicates your shittyattempts to justify racism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (24 children)

    I'm not sure I said anything about race, much less racist. I gave a total hypothetical everyone seems to want to focus on more so than the point it was representing, guess I should have used something like aliens for the hypothetical. At any stretch you seem bothered and I hope you're alright and if you're not alright I hope you find peace.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (23 children)

    What are you even excited about? What do you really oppose here?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (22 children)

    I didn't say I was or was not excited. People have things and generally they try and prevent others who may want those things from taking them. That was kinda the core of the original point. I didn't think it was going to be such a controversial take.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (21 children)

    people generally have things

    No, I live under capitalism. I generally don't.

    and prevent others from taking them

    And I tend to share when I do. There's a name for it, I think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (20 children)

    You have your life and current health. What if someone wanted to take that from you? Trust me you have things.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (19 children)

    My health is something I buy on the black market. My life is something cops would I'm sure very much like to take.

    How are either comparable to real estate? Are there a bunch of little holes in the nearest dirt to you the size of your dick, or is life just worth basically nothing to you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (18 children)

    I had to switch the object to keep with the sentiment of the argument aka someone wants to take something from someone else they don't want taken. The argument isn't that a life is equivalent to land. Group X wants to take from group Y something they don't want taken.

    How does someone buy their health illegally? That's something I haven't heard before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (17 children)

    Yeah you've never known anyone marginalized. Doesn't shock me. Lmk when you're old enough you wouldn't fuck you, like 16 or so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (16 children)

    Why do you keep adding things I've never said. It's a really interesting behavior. It's a bit like talking to an overly aggressive hallucinating AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (15 children)

    You didn't say explicitly but strongly implied. I understand what you're trying to say, I've thought about it more than you, and I'm not a raging bigot, so I'm rejecting the idea you're having trouble articulating because you can't make it sound not-evil even in your straw man that in no way resembles the actual thing.

    Except that last part. That was me calling you a 14 year old who thinks Ayn rand was smart.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (14 children)

    I mean I explicitly and strongly disagree with that synopsis for whatever it's worth. In its most general sense it's just an aspect of reality. A gazelle wanting to keep its life and a lion wanting to eat the gazelle. Group X wants something group Y doesn't want to give. In a lot of circumstances it is evil but not all. Like conceptually this shouldn't be a highly contested thing, it's about as everyday as the sum rising and setting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (13 children)

    And you think these two concerns are equal or equivalent to a property transaction? Do you not understand how death works?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (12 children)

    I'll repeat what I've said. I brought up land and you said land doesn't matter so to get the point across I moved on to something I think does matter to you personally. Of course to others their land is like their life and they are willing to kill and die for it, since you're not currently in that circumstance I had to equate it to something.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (11 children)

    I don't think an ownership change of land is the same as the end of a life, no. The land remains.

    No person I know owns land. My landlord is a corporation. Has always been a corporation.

    I don't think the feelings of colonizers count, matter, or are genuine. They're all theatrical liars making shit up yo justify their racial supremacist and theocratic genocides. They would in nearly every case defile and destroy the thing rather than give it up, and that doesn't sound like the thing is what's important to them, but their fetishization and dominance of the thing.

    I don't think you could comprehend my value system if you tried, and I don't think you have, or respect you enough to explain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (10 children)

    The world is big, just because you're personally experiencing something doesn't mean everyone else is having the same experience, that everyone lives in the same country, and so on. For instance Palestinians are willing to fight and die for their land even though the individuals don't own all of the land, same for Ukrainians in Ukraine. It's not like every last soldier owns all the land they are defending.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (9 children)

    palestine, Ukraine

    Those are both extermination wars where they previously ceded land and it didn't stop the aggression.

    They fight or they die. The Ukrainians could also run. You don't know what you're talking about, and are trying to fit real world situations to your bullshit. Call me when you're old enough that the fact you still 'date' twelve year olds is creepy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (8 children)

    They could just run. I doubt Russia would kill all 39M Ukrainians, Israel on the other hand most definitely is trying to kill all Palestinians. Russia just wants a buffer zone between them and NATO as well as those very valuable natural gas deposits and of course a port that doesn't freeze shut every winter. Also to boot the Kievan Rus originate in that area so it's kinda like taking back their ancestral land.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (7 children)

    You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (6 children)

    It's fine we have a difference of opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (5 children)

    No, I have a world view that occasionally flirts with bare-metal reality. Yours has never been in a room with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    Once again I disagree. The general circumstance that someone or a group wants something that another individual or group does not want to give is just an aspect of being alive. It can be as simple as simple as a predator and prey to someone getting mugged to a genocide, X wants something Y doesn't want to give. Now how is that not an aspect of reality?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (3 children)

    But there are no people in one if those groups. Its just corporations.

    And ownership is kind of nonsense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    In which specific instance are you referring to? All land on earth isn't owned by corporations. As for ownership, there's always an owner, even in communism the state is the owner.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments