204
Documents suggest Victoria police ask AI for legal advice, feed it personal info (www.nationalobserver.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/canada@lemmy.ca
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 2 months ago (5 children)

... a FOREIGN party. That's data sovereignty and unchecked spreading of P-I.

We don't sue much for that - thats for Americans - but it should be a career-limiting decision.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The article calls it an internal tool, meaning it’s probably sanctioned by leadership. I don’t know, everything after the first paragraph is behind a paywall.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago*

    Approval by leadership of a tool is not necessarily reflective of the governance requirements of the organization. Data classification exists but in VERY few orgs is it respected and followed.

    “You can use ChatGPT to write Facebook posts” is sanctioning by leadership.

    “You can use ChatGPT” is what people often hear.

    15 years ago it was “my manager got us Dropbox”.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent