I said to themselves, that doesn't mean others can't disagree and easily. While I don't agree with Zionist reasoning they seem to feel justified through the argument that greater Israel is promised to them by their God. Always a fun one when people use their religion, it's ultimately infallible to themselves through their faith albeit clearly misguided to those not faithful.

It's human nature at its core. Someone wants something, they craft a reasoning to get it and honestly it's rare that the reasoning is actually any good, but all the same they believe it and they are internally justified to themselves. That doesn't mean the justification is good or accurate or right or not easily dismissible by others, it just means they're justified to themselves as I originally stated.

A mind typically can't or at least doesn't do what it itself has not justified and unfortunately for us all human minds aren't logically consistent, they are storytellers and you can bend logic two ways to Sunday with the right story at least for those who want to hear it.

Not really, the original point I keep trying to focus back to is the general situation in which a group X wants to take group Y's land in really any context not specific to any circumstance. Also I don't appreciate the way you're talking so I'm going to stop talking to you. We can have civil discussion if you want. To be civil..

I think we're still a little stuck in the specifics here.