Ukraine struck Russia's largest oil refinery, located in the city of Omsk, on Monday, marking what its forces say was its furthest-ever drone attack in the war.

The Omsk facility, which processes about 21 million tons of oil a year, is in Western Siberia and about 1,700 miles from Ukrainian territory — roughly the distance between Los Angeles and Houston.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 2 months ago (13 children)

You need to cut demand. If the price goes up, refineries are just build elsewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Perhaps, but you can’t tell me Russia can build them faster than Ukraine can destroy them. And in the meantime it means millions of fewer barrels worth of greenhouse gas emissions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    They can be built outside Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Sure, but that’s not a solution for Russia’s own energy demands

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I was thinking more of the globalized market for oil.

    If Russia can export less refined oil, that can encourage the construction of new refineries elsewhere. This could negate the impact of drone attacks on reducing CO2 emissions.

    But as others have said, there's demand destruction that can have an effect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    How many years does it take to build a refinery from scratch? 3? 8? And perhaps a new refinery elsewhere will be a tad cleaner?

    The real outcome however, could be that Russia tries to quickly apply bandaids to their broken infrastructure to get it up and running again fast. And that way their oil refining could become more polluting than ever.

    I think on the global scale, Hormuz has a way bigger influence on helping many countries move towards renewables faster.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    In many cases it's cheaper to replace it with green alternatives. The refineries have competition from windmills, solar plants, etc. It's not a given that new refineries will fill the gap in the market that destroyed refineries leave.

    I do expect the destruction of refineries to be more positive for the climate than if they had continued producing. Especially if you factor in the demand for reliable supply and strategic availability of energy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*

    You need to cut demand. If the price goes up

    Prices going up does help cut demand.

    Back in the '70s when oil prices spiked, people started buying more fuel efficient cars, and drove less.

    Today, after the Hormuz related price increases, demand for EVs has abruptly increased.

    If the price of oil continues to increase, that trend will also continue.

  • source
  • parent