102

What an absolute shitshow

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 23 hours ago

MIT is terrible if it replaces current GPL projects. Companies will always provide their spyware infested proprietary version of the exact same thing which have one or two additional features, making open source software always behind rhe propruetary counterparts. See: Chromium->Google Chrome, Aosp->any Android os vendor

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 16 hours ago

Great projects have used MIT without any issues. Godot for instance, which may also be needed, I don't know if games made by godot could be closed source if it would use gnu license for instance.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Godot didn't replace an existing broadly used GPL game engine, so this is irrelevant.

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The logic was that with a mit license companies will provide a copy of the software infected with spyware leaving the open source project behind.

Explain why that hasn't happened to godot.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

No, the logic was that replacing a GPL project with an MIT project is bad.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago

Because Godot is already quite ibferior to its proprietary alternatives, atleast in popularity. If godot was The game engine that everyone uses, proprietary ones will come and try to have it. They can have all the godot features as well as something new from their side

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Could you provide some examples when that had happened?

I'm looking up famous projects using mit license and in any of those that had happened.

Lua, node.js, jQuery....

Even X11 which was indeed replaced by other system.... Wayland, which also uses MIT license.

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 51 minutes ago

Lua, node.js, jQuery

Programming languages and other developer tools are very much less affected by this, since being open source is mostly a requirement for a programming language in most people's eyes. I wouldn't even learn a proprietary programming language when there are open ones. Being proprietary make it lose its appeal very much.

About peoprietary X11 and wayland... For whom are companies making them for? Linux users? Do you think any distro will switch to it? But i'm pretty sure most companues copy parts of code from such projects to use in theirs.

I gave Aosp- Vendor Android and chrome-chromium as examples in the beggining. Also if only linux kernel was GPLv3, android would be way more proprietary bloat free.

Unfortunately companies have even done this exact same thing even with GPL, illegally, and got away with it because open source devs usually can't bother to file lawsuits to companies in another country

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
102 points (88.1% liked)

Linux

66232 readers
542 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS