I mean this in the kindest way possible but that's a bunch of pseudo nonsense and you should really rethink your understanding of the technology.
When training LLMs the techniques aren't psychology. At all. It is literally "when you see this token, there's an x% chance this token will follow". That's it. That is literally the entirety of the "training" and the entirety of what those weights represent. It might sound like psychology because "neural networks" but our understand of biology has evolved since they were first named and we now understand that isn't how neurons actually work at all.
If you have other papers I'm all eyes but the ones I've seen stated quite emphatically current AI systems are not aware or conscious. (That's just one example, every paper I've seen not from a lone quack has followed similar conclusions).
The entirety of any sense of consciousness detected is because it has all the recorded works of every human in its database. Any hints of awareness or consciousness are because humanity loves to think and that is reflected in our words.
Those lists of commands we've formed for AI are just vector mathematics that are added to any queries. Because that's all LLMs are. Vector math. That's it. It isn't consciousness, we aren't actually commanding the things, we're biasing the tokens so that certain words are more likely to come up than others.
Any sense of us detecting consciousness is pareidolia because we are monkeys primed to see patterns whether they're actually the thing or not.