723
Welp, there goes the bourgeois
(thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
723 points (99.3% liked)
Flippanarchy
2603 readers
36 users here now
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I'm also exhausted. I wish I was wrong. Nothing would please me more.
Well congratulations, all the evidence still points at the fact that you are wrong. You're free.
I love how everyone on the internet assumes everyone else on the internet is an idiot with no relevant education or work experience on a given topic. I'll join in the fun.
Brilliant. That you for violating your NDA to add your genuine expert understanding, Dr. Mushroommunk.
This one's for anyone following along more than you. I won't be replying again.
Maybe stop proving them right?
Let's review.
I started with my relevant education and experience. Provided peer reviewed research that hundreds of people were involved in. Provided a rebuttal of the research you linked to (granted not the most well written as I was tired, but a rebuttal).
You made a grand claim (which in the scientific community puts the onus of proof on you). You provided zero relevant education or experience. You provided one non peer reviewed paper by a single student. You provided zero proof that paper even made the claim you were trying to assert for it. You provided zero rebuttal for the paper I provided. You ended with a thought terminating cliche.