▲ 139 ▼ Mullvad’s founder Daniel Berntsson donates millions to local fascist that supports forced "remigration" of Swedish non-white citizens (www.flamman.se) submitted 1 month ago by Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Boisterous@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago (1 child) I'm out of the loop on Bitwarden. What happened there? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 17 points 1 month ago (3 children) New CEO comes from private equity and it looks like he wants to run it as such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Boisterous@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago Ah. Shit. So they'll drive me away all on their own then. Wonderful. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Manalith@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Do you know if anything they're doing is going to affect Vaultwarden at all? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Vaultwarden is a fork, so BW can decide to cut them off anytime if they want to start charging everyone. There’s no indication of that happening yet, but that’s a possibility. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Vaultwarden isn't a fork. It is a completely independent implementation of the bitwarden api. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 point 1 month ago I stand corrected then. But the point still stands that BW can cut them off anytime. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago Ok, so nothing happened, it just looks like it might. I think I will wait with being angry once he actually runs it like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 17 points 1 month ago (3 children) New CEO comes from private equity and it looks like he wants to run it as such. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Boisterous@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago Ah. Shit. So they'll drive me away all on their own then. Wonderful. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Manalith@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Do you know if anything they're doing is going to affect Vaultwarden at all? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Vaultwarden is a fork, so BW can decide to cut them off anytime if they want to start charging everyone. There’s no indication of that happening yet, but that’s a possibility. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Vaultwarden isn't a fork. It is a completely independent implementation of the bitwarden api. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 point 1 month ago I stand corrected then. But the point still stands that BW can cut them off anytime. permalink fedilink source parent [–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago Ok, so nothing happened, it just looks like it might. I think I will wait with being angry once he actually runs it like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Boisterous@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago Ah. Shit. So they'll drive me away all on their own then. Wonderful. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Manalith@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) Do you know if anything they're doing is going to affect Vaultwarden at all? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Vaultwarden is a fork, so BW can decide to cut them off anytime if they want to start charging everyone. There’s no indication of that happening yet, but that’s a possibility. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Vaultwarden isn't a fork. It is a completely independent implementation of the bitwarden api. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 point 1 month ago I stand corrected then. But the point still stands that BW can cut them off anytime. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) Vaultwarden is a fork, so BW can decide to cut them off anytime if they want to start charging everyone. There’s no indication of that happening yet, but that’s a possibility. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Vaultwarden isn't a fork. It is a completely independent implementation of the bitwarden api. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 point 1 month ago I stand corrected then. But the point still stands that BW can cut them off anytime. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] philipp_@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (1 child) Vaultwarden isn't a fork. It is a completely independent implementation of the bitwarden api. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 point 1 month ago I stand corrected then. But the point still stands that BW can cut them off anytime. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scytale@piefed.zip 1 point 1 month ago I stand corrected then. But the point still stands that BW can cut them off anytime. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dev_null@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago Ok, so nothing happened, it just looks like it might. I think I will wait with being angry once he actually runs it like that. permalink fedilink source parent