▲ 355 ▼ TIL that cars in Europe have grown average 1.2cm longer every year since 2000 (www.theguardian.com) submitted 2 months ago by Lurian@lemmy.world to c/til@lemmy.world 62 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 0 points 2 months ago (1 child) Safety regulations require things like better crumple zones. The seating areas aren't significantly larger. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Photonic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Nah that’s not just it. People used to drive sedans and hatchbacks, now everyone and their mother has an SUV permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) It's all related. You can't add a thousand pounds of safety equipment and larger crumple zones and make a full size sedan that consistently gets 40+ mpg. Companies pivoted to the SUV because it didn't have to have absurdly good fuel efficiency, and people liked being "bigger" despite often having less space than full size sedans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Photonic@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago There’s no reason to make it worse just because it’s already a bit bad. Hatchbacks and sedans still exist and they really don’t have anywhere near 1000lbs of extra safety equipment. It’s just a trend that blew over from the US. Here is some more info. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) Nah that’s not just it. People used to drive sedans and hatchbacks, now everyone and their mother has an SUV permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) It's all related. You can't add a thousand pounds of safety equipment and larger crumple zones and make a full size sedan that consistently gets 40+ mpg. Companies pivoted to the SUV because it didn't have to have absurdly good fuel efficiency, and people liked being "bigger" despite often having less space than full size sedans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Photonic@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago There’s no reason to make it worse just because it’s already a bit bad. Hatchbacks and sedans still exist and they really don’t have anywhere near 1000lbs of extra safety equipment. It’s just a trend that blew over from the US. Here is some more info. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) It's all related. You can't add a thousand pounds of safety equipment and larger crumple zones and make a full size sedan that consistently gets 40+ mpg. Companies pivoted to the SUV because it didn't have to have absurdly good fuel efficiency, and people liked being "bigger" despite often having less space than full size sedans. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Photonic@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago There’s no reason to make it worse just because it’s already a bit bad. Hatchbacks and sedans still exist and they really don’t have anywhere near 1000lbs of extra safety equipment. It’s just a trend that blew over from the US. Here is some more info. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Photonic@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago There’s no reason to make it worse just because it’s already a bit bad. Hatchbacks and sedans still exist and they really don’t have anywhere near 1000lbs of extra safety equipment. It’s just a trend that blew over from the US. Here is some more info. permalink fedilink source parent