732
Bastards (thelemmy.club)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/adhd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
58 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

But original VGA could be 640x480, 800x600 or 1024x768.

Also I think it supported a 320x240, and then later on it would support much higher resolutions.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Again, thats the stupid part. VGA means only 640x480. SVGA is 800x600 and QVGA is 1024x768.

    All of those resolutions can be successfully sent through a….VGA cable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Didn’t EGA also support some of those resolutions?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    This is exactly why the acronym for display standards was so terrible.

    The Extended Graphics Adapter (abbreviated XGA, obviously) by IBM was introduced with multiple resolutions available, named XGA and various deritives.

    EGA came earlier and was colloquially used to refer to 16-color display modes, but wasn't used to define a specific resolution.

    More specifically, EGA was a color palatte that had 64 colors available, 16 of which could be displayed at one time.

    And then there's CGA which came prior to EGA, but like it referred to color modes rather than resolution.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Even CGA had at least a couple of different modes because you had the mode with four colors. But you also had a higher resolution mode that was just black and white. Or maybe it was black in one of the colors. I don't remember. It's been too long now. But even CJ had at least two different resolutions

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent