172
Supreme Court rules Rastafari man can’t sue Louisiana prison officials who cut his dreadlocks (apnews.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 3 months ago* (3 children)

Does anyone actually understand what the ruling is arguing? It seems to be arguing that the individuals are not liable since they did not sign a contract.

Honesty it is horrifying that the supreme court is now a political tool. Justices should not have a political party affiliation

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Ok I'm not a legal expert and I think this is an abhorrent thing. He should have not had his head shaved.

    However the main point of the ruling is that he can't sue prison in a federal court because at the time it happened it wasn't technically a federal prison. Which is just a ruling on jurisdiction.

    I believe he can still sue other ways.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    You can sue in federal court if the act was breaking federal law. This is how most civil rights abuse cases are filed.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Yup. You bet there is an army of asshole lawyers looking for "well, ackshually" technical methods to invalidate the entire bill of rights.

    The idea that a fucking PRISON doesn't have to follow the Bill of Rights for any kind of technicality is just further confirmation that we're living in a fascist state.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent