Exactly. Marx never really used the term capitalism as such, except as an adjective e.g. capitalist mode of production. The point wasn’t to define an abstraction but to explain a concrete, historical form of society, in terms of its particularity (the capitalist form) and how that is the manifestation of the general or universal (the mode of production) which is independent of the form of society.
Some early Marxists tried to generalize it as a theory of commodity society or of money but even that is imprecise, as Rubin explains in his essays, partly because commodities and money can and did exist outside of capitalism. Capitalism is about capital.
