▲ 337 ▼ British Charlie Kirk wannabe beaten up debating people in Manchester (metro.co.uk) submitted 2 months ago by Quokka@quokk.au to c/world@quokk.au 108 comments fedilink hide all child comments Young Bob Manchester assault: Three people arrested after remigration activist set upon by youths
[–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago (2 children) One person's terrorist is another person's freedom fighter. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] timewarp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) One person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter. A "freedom fighter" risks their life to fight an oppressive state and its military apparatus. A terrorist targets unarmed civilians to induce fear and enforce political conformity. You aren't fighting an oppressive state. If you want to see an oppressive state, look at the UK government currently using the Terrorism Act to arrest 82-year-old pensioners and bundle them into police vans simply for holding placards that read, "I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action." That is actual state oppression. But you aren't fighting that state. Instead, you are cheering for a street mob to violently beat a civilian who holds zero institutional power, simply to ensure that people who share his political opinions "stay afraid." Punching up at an authoritarian regime makes you a freedom fighter. Using violence to silence a civilian while completely ignoring the actual authoritarianism being wielded by the state right in front of you makes you a street thug. Don't flatter yourself by dressing up mob violence as a liberation movement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago I said 8 words about your usage of the word terrorist to remind you that you chose to inflect that pejorative connotation. Don't know why you wrote 4 paragraphs addressing points I never touched. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 child) One person’s terrorist is another person’s freedom fighter. A "freedom fighter" risks their life to fight an oppressive state and its military apparatus. A terrorist targets unarmed civilians to induce fear and enforce political conformity. You aren't fighting an oppressive state. If you want to see an oppressive state, look at the UK government currently using the Terrorism Act to arrest 82-year-old pensioners and bundle them into police vans simply for holding placards that read, "I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action." That is actual state oppression. But you aren't fighting that state. Instead, you are cheering for a street mob to violently beat a civilian who holds zero institutional power, simply to ensure that people who share his political opinions "stay afraid." Punching up at an authoritarian regime makes you a freedom fighter. Using violence to silence a civilian while completely ignoring the actual authoritarianism being wielded by the state right in front of you makes you a street thug. Don't flatter yourself by dressing up mob violence as a liberation movement. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago I said 8 words about your usage of the word terrorist to remind you that you chose to inflect that pejorative connotation. Don't know why you wrote 4 paragraphs addressing points I never touched. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] barooboodoo@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago I said 8 words about your usage of the word terrorist to remind you that you chose to inflect that pejorative connotation. Don't know why you wrote 4 paragraphs addressing points I never touched. permalink fedilink source parent