358
Why are so many Linux projects on Microsoft GitHub? Shouldn't they all move to Codeberg? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by to c/linux@lemmy.ml
126 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Sure, I know a lot of projects have been on GH since before MS bought it, but they've owned it for quite a while now, so we really should be seeing better migration out by now, no?

Codeberg is nonprofit which seems more in the spirit of the Linux ecosystem overall. GH is for-profit...

EDIT: All right, all right, I've gotten schooled. Thank you, O wise ones; I didn't realize how much Microsoft literally depends on Linux, among other things. I will proceed to shut up.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Embrace, extend, extinguish.

Microsoft embraced github by buying it. They extended the features and ease of use to where it's the primary website people use for sharing and collaborating on code. Now it extinguishes any alternative.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    It already was the primary code sharing place though... that's why they bought it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago*

    Embrace extend extinguish is a well known pattern microslop uses to kill open source alternatives. You're right it was already big which is why they embraced it (we're both agreeing here) all I'm saying is they make sure it's impossible to develop an alternative due to network effects and vendor default lock in. "Embrace extend extinguish" is From their own internal communications found during discovery.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent