you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 3 months ago (18 children)

You definitely interpret people wanting the Iranian people to succeed vs the Iranian regime. Good on you for getting the nuance completely correct without a single ounce of error on your part. Terrific job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 3 months ago (17 children)

    Try to find an actual mistake in my reasoning rather than sarcastic nonsense

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    This is the regime all these Iran apologists on Lemmy are rooting for

    No one is rooting for this regime to succeed. We are rooting for the innocent citizens who were killed by an illegal American invasion and also believe that Iran doesn't deserve to be invaded illegally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    No one? Really? Have you been to Lemmy before?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    Your premise is flawed. You can't have a founded argument with a flawed premise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    You still can’t do it…. Maybe try to find out how it is flawed

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago* (9 children)

    Since you cant decypher sarcasm (you cant seem to make sense of it, you admitted), your premise is "people want the iranian regime to succeed" which is a straw man. You need to do a steel man instead. You have no founded argument because you chose to do a straw man instead of a steel man.

    If you have any trouble interpreting or comprehending that let me know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (8 children)

    I never said such a thing, so maybe it is your own understanding that is flawed: I said that what you said was nonsense, while also being sarcastic, i.e. ”sarcastic nonsense”.

    And no, I’ve met actual –not straw but flesh and bones– people on here who said Iran were the good guys, as well as Hamas and that the October 7 attacks were justified.

    So maybe, if you want to have a normal discussion, next time don’t start out by acting like a massive jerk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

    "all these"

    How many have you found to say "all these" iran regime apologists? Give me the huge number you have found. Whats the percentage of political comments on the iran war on lemmy that confirms your assertion that you claim is not flawed at all. Surely you have copious amounts of comments you can definitely say there is no nuance and unequivocally want the regime to win over the people of iran winning. Especially when Iran is just defending itself from aggressors.

    Until you do that, you haven't done shit. I will act however I want. I dont care about your feelings, I demand you to defend your assertions with facts and data. But you fail to provide it time and time again. You are a straw manning and have no ability to attempt a steel man.

    You gave two earlier and one was just a dude from turkey saying "go iran!"

    I dont know if counting is your strong suit, but seeing two comments is not a lot, certainly not enough to warrant "all these"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Ahhh yes, acting like a massive narcissist jerk again I see, ‘cause that worked so well last time…

    I won’t deal with obtuse idiots who can’t have a normal discussion, so I will say: go out and have a look. You’re on the source itself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago* (5 children)

    I'm sorry I made you cry, facts over feelings next time brother. Welcome to adult conversations on the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (4 children)

    Ahh yes, only being able to respond with sarcastic idiocy and claiming you made someone cry is peak adult conversation…

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

    Again, you cant defend your claims. Keep being proud in your ignorance and claiming to be the mature one here. You got called out, cant substantiate any of your assertions, and youre lashing out instead of admitting you made grand claims without evidence.

    You are the adultest one here certainly. I believe that, it does take age to lack the ability to reflect. I am an asshole. I understand I hurt peoples feelings. But I care about your data more than your idea of decorum, whereas you care more about your ego.

    Only one of us here is downvoting the other, and I think that is telling of which one of us is the person with the emotional tolerance of a toddler. Keep telling yourself you are a grown adult though, I am sure that gets you everything you want.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    What makes you think I want to defend my claims against someone who decided to act like a jerk and mock me? You act like we’re on a high-school playground and suddenly want to talk “adult”. Doesn’t work that way. Better luck next time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    lol. Again, apologies for making you cry. Defend your claims better next time with data instead of your fee fees, and maybe you get treated better. Don't open your mouth with baseless claims if you can't back it up. Food for thought. Open your mind to the possibilities of being wrong and you will learn lots in life young whipper snapper.

    You have no argument. Your claims are baseless. You will not defend them. We're all flawed. I am an asshole. You are intellectually dishonest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment