▲ 589 ▼ Rule, nail in coffin (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 3 years ago by Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone 93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Datas_Cat_Spot@startrek.website 50 points 3 years ago (3 children) Is this real?? I can't imagine it's hard to scroll past 600 posts in a day if you use twitter a lot. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] olbaidiablo@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 years ago So, once you're done your 600 posts, you'll go somewhere else where you can scroll endlessly, then slowly find yourself more and more going to that somewhere else instead of twitter. Elon twitler Musk is an idiot. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 38 points 3 years ago (2 children) I never really used twitter, but if I used it like i use ANY other social media site, yeah. I would fill that up in like an hour..... and I use these sites all day long... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chowder@lemmy.one 46 points 3 years ago (1 child) I still have my Twitter, I'll go check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chowder@lemmy.one 71 points 3 years ago (3 children) 23 min permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Datas_Cat_Spot@startrek.website 29 points 3 years ago This is some top notch investigative journalism right here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 19 points 3 years ago LOLOLOL i appreciate you so much permalink fedilink source parent [–] bxyrk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 years ago My only significant use for twitter is smut, so.... Yeah plenty of time 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nepenthe@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Oh, absolutely. It seriously discourages any kind of conversation, because no one will want to read through the replies and waste their content limit. All attention will be skewed from heavily favoring big accounts to catering ONLY to big accounts, who may see a drop off in fan interaction for the same reason. People respond to celebrity accounts to gush and ask venue/content questions and such. This is the death knell to any of those questions ever being seen. For myself, I used to follow a TON of microflashfic accounts, which by self-imposed rules are short, concise stories told in 140 characters or less. A bit like r/twosentencehorror but they tended to feel a lot more impactful. I loved and miss them, and I consider it a lost art that I wish I could bring at least to mastodon. But because they fit in less than a single tweet by necessity, I could easily read through a hundred in 20 minutes if I just went through the tag. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Saf@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago Yeah it's real: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1675187969420828672 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] olbaidiablo@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 years ago So, once you're done your 600 posts, you'll go somewhere else where you can scroll endlessly, then slowly find yourself more and more going to that somewhere else instead of twitter. Elon twitler Musk is an idiot. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 38 points 3 years ago (2 children) I never really used twitter, but if I used it like i use ANY other social media site, yeah. I would fill that up in like an hour..... and I use these sites all day long... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] chowder@lemmy.one 46 points 3 years ago (1 child) I still have my Twitter, I'll go check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chowder@lemmy.one 71 points 3 years ago (3 children) 23 min permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Datas_Cat_Spot@startrek.website 29 points 3 years ago This is some top notch investigative journalism right here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 19 points 3 years ago LOLOLOL i appreciate you so much permalink fedilink source parent [–] bxyrk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 years ago My only significant use for twitter is smut, so.... Yeah plenty of time 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nepenthe@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Oh, absolutely. It seriously discourages any kind of conversation, because no one will want to read through the replies and waste their content limit. All attention will be skewed from heavily favoring big accounts to catering ONLY to big accounts, who may see a drop off in fan interaction for the same reason. People respond to celebrity accounts to gush and ask venue/content questions and such. This is the death knell to any of those questions ever being seen. For myself, I used to follow a TON of microflashfic accounts, which by self-imposed rules are short, concise stories told in 140 characters or less. A bit like r/twosentencehorror but they tended to feel a lot more impactful. I loved and miss them, and I consider it a lost art that I wish I could bring at least to mastodon. But because they fit in less than a single tweet by necessity, I could easily read through a hundred in 20 minutes if I just went through the tag. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chowder@lemmy.one 46 points 3 years ago (1 child) I still have my Twitter, I'll go check. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] chowder@lemmy.one 71 points 3 years ago (3 children) 23 min permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Datas_Cat_Spot@startrek.website 29 points 3 years ago This is some top notch investigative journalism right here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 19 points 3 years ago LOLOLOL i appreciate you so much permalink fedilink source parent [–] bxyrk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 years ago My only significant use for twitter is smut, so.... Yeah plenty of time 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chowder@lemmy.one 71 points 3 years ago (3 children) 23 min permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Datas_Cat_Spot@startrek.website 29 points 3 years ago This is some top notch investigative journalism right here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 19 points 3 years ago LOLOLOL i appreciate you so much permalink fedilink source parent [–] bxyrk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 years ago My only significant use for twitter is smut, so.... Yeah plenty of time 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Datas_Cat_Spot@startrek.website 29 points 3 years ago This is some top notch investigative journalism right here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 19 points 3 years ago LOLOLOL i appreciate you so much permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bxyrk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 years ago My only significant use for twitter is smut, so.... Yeah plenty of time 🤣 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nepenthe@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Oh, absolutely. It seriously discourages any kind of conversation, because no one will want to read through the replies and waste their content limit. All attention will be skewed from heavily favoring big accounts to catering ONLY to big accounts, who may see a drop off in fan interaction for the same reason. People respond to celebrity accounts to gush and ask venue/content questions and such. This is the death knell to any of those questions ever being seen. For myself, I used to follow a TON of microflashfic accounts, which by self-imposed rules are short, concise stories told in 140 characters or less. A bit like r/twosentencehorror but they tended to feel a lot more impactful. I loved and miss them, and I consider it a lost art that I wish I could bring at least to mastodon. But because they fit in less than a single tweet by necessity, I could easily read through a hundred in 20 minutes if I just went through the tag. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Saf@kbin.social 2 points 3 years ago Yeah it's real: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1675187969420828672 permalink fedilink source parent