▲ 589 ▼ Rule, nail in coffin (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 3 years ago by Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone 93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] RubberDucky@programming.dev 30 points 3 years ago (5 children) Also could be that they are scaling down systems permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] chowder@lemmy.one 24 points 3 years ago Im just saying, he hasn't been paying bills and it's the first of the month. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 years ago Yeah. That feels more likely. Twitter has been running for years and likely isn’t a stranger to something like this. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 14 points 3 years ago Yeah something I thought since he was "forced" to buy twitter, was he would just burn it to the ground. What does he care? permalink fedilink source parent [–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Why would that affect these metrics? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thurstylark@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Less servers able to serve requests means either get overloaded and have downtime, or rate limit and stay up. Both are bad, but rate limiting is less bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I see, I guess at that scale API requests add up. I suppose it is a solution, and if replies don’t count, the limits are rather reasonable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thurstylark@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Yeah, exactly. Also worth mentioning, the scale of Twitter also means that they have contractual obligations when it comes to uptime (for advertisers etc), so downtime could be very costly indeed. permalink fedilink source parent [–] animelivesmatter@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago It's almost as though the mass exodus he bragged about causing has consequences permalink fedilink source parent
[–] chowder@lemmy.one 24 points 3 years ago Im just saying, he hasn't been paying bills and it's the first of the month. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rakn@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 years ago Yeah. That feels more likely. Twitter has been running for years and likely isn’t a stranger to something like this. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Linuxduck@lemmy.blahaj.zone [S] 14 points 3 years ago Yeah something I thought since he was "forced" to buy twitter, was he would just burn it to the ground. What does he care? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 years ago (1 child) Why would that affect these metrics? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thurstylark@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Less servers able to serve requests means either get overloaded and have downtime, or rate limit and stay up. Both are bad, but rate limiting is less bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I see, I guess at that scale API requests add up. I suppose it is a solution, and if replies don’t count, the limits are rather reasonable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thurstylark@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Yeah, exactly. Also worth mentioning, the scale of Twitter also means that they have contractual obligations when it comes to uptime (for advertisers etc), so downtime could be very costly indeed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thurstylark@lemm.ee 6 points 3 years ago (1 child) Less servers able to serve requests means either get overloaded and have downtime, or rate limit and stay up. Both are bad, but rate limiting is less bad. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I see, I guess at that scale API requests add up. I suppose it is a solution, and if replies don’t count, the limits are rather reasonable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thurstylark@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Yeah, exactly. Also worth mentioning, the scale of Twitter also means that they have contractual obligations when it comes to uptime (for advertisers etc), so downtime could be very costly indeed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 1 point 3 years ago (1 child) I see, I guess at that scale API requests add up. I suppose it is a solution, and if replies don’t count, the limits are rather reasonable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] thurstylark@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Yeah, exactly. Also worth mentioning, the scale of Twitter also means that they have contractual obligations when it comes to uptime (for advertisers etc), so downtime could be very costly indeed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thurstylark@lemm.ee 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) Yeah, exactly. Also worth mentioning, the scale of Twitter also means that they have contractual obligations when it comes to uptime (for advertisers etc), so downtime could be very costly indeed. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] animelivesmatter@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago It's almost as though the mass exodus he bragged about causing has consequences permalink fedilink source parent