videos
Breadtube if it didn't suck.
Post videos you genuinely enjoy and want to share, duh. Celebrate the diversity of interests shared by chapochatters by posting a deep dive into Venetian kelp farming, I dunno. Also media criticism, bite-sized versions of left-wing theory, all the stuff you expected. But I am curious about that kelp farming thing now that you mentioned it.
Low effort / spam videos might be removed, especially weeb content.
There is a cytube that you can paste videos into and watch with whoever happens to be around. It's open submission unless there's something important to commandeer it with at the time.
A weekly watch party happens every Saturday (Sunday down under), with video nominations Saturday-Monday, voting Monday-Thursday. See the pin for whatever stage it's currently in.
view the rest of the comments
Whomst among us has not posted footage of the century and then not noticed for twenty years that it got zero views and engagement?
youtube was made in 2005 lol
i dont even think you could upload videos when it first launched
ok what?
nvm im trippin
I'm not trying to give the guy too much of a pass, but it's possible he left it private on another site. Youtube wasn't the first video streaming site, but it wasn't very big before that though, and idk if "private uploads" were a thing in 2001.
I literally do not know what to believe in regards to 9/11. Part of me wants to believe that hijackers got lucky and that the US government really is that dumb. Another part of me wants to jump into a world of psyops, demolitions, remote controlled planes, gold stolen from Iraq, opium smuggled out afghanistan. I JUST DON'T KNOW. And to add fuel to the fire is the date it was uploaded, his comments about keeping it private in 2001, the other psyop shit on his channel.
One of the most important facts that convinced me that JFK's assassination was an intelligence op is the alteration of his parade route to include Houston and Elm streets, because the shots from the office buildings in the area (and grassy knoll) would have been impossible without that change, and only the most senior national security officials would have the authority to alter the parade route.
Similarly, one of the major facts that convinced me that Bush did 9/11 is the presence of the NORAD drills (documented by Michael C. Ruppert). The drills were about intercepting hijacked airplanes that were being piloted into skyscrapers, and they were moved to the date of 9/11 from their original schedule. The confusion created by the drills that morning made the attacks possible, and Osama bin Laden did not have the authority to schedule those drills.
So what do you think, drone planes and controlled demolitions?
I personally do believe so, yes.
The New Atheist deboonker person that I was fifteen years ago would be horrified to hear me say that, and I'm even afraid to admit to it here on hexbear because I know from experience that any mention of controlled demolition theory will bring the debate nerds out of the woodwork, and I don't feel like engaging in a discussion on it right now. I just wanted to give an honest and short answer to your direct question, which takes a pinch of courage because it's a third rail topic.
P.S. There is no need to share the WTYP episode on the WTC with me, comrades, I've already watched it three times, and I plan on eventually organizing my thoughts on it into a long-form blog response. I'll have the energy to discuss it once I've posted that.
Well I appreciate your honesty. I just don't know what to believe, I can so see it being either or at this point. I'll say this much, if it did turn out to be an inside job, I would not be surprised in the least.
This, and United 93 was 100% shot down when they figured it was headed for D.C.
You mean to add jet fuel to the steel beams? :quokka-smile: :isaac-pog: