you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Dude, it's right there in the title.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    It was a rhetorical question. I know she said that about Epstein, but what about her husband who socialised with him plus the business practises at Microsoft

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I am sure she was fine with it because she married him and grew rich off his unethical business practices. She got what she wanted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I don't quite understand why or how we try to give the wives of these evil megalomaniac billionaires a free pass.

    They are either complicit, helping them to be evil megalomaniac billionaires, or they simply do not care what the evil megalomaniac billionaires do as long as they get to live the rich life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    The reason is sexism.

    Either people believe the wives to be innocent because something something men suck women are the best and can do no wrong unlike evil men,

    Or

    People believe the wives re innocent becausw they think the women too dumb to know what was going on or too disinterested to find out.

    Both are sexist bullshit pushed by people who don't understand the rich are all in it together, and are all opposed to being held accountable by the poors

  • source
  • parent