235
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago

At first, I thought it was meant to poke fun at people who over analyze or really reach when discussing literature, but I don't think it means that.

It still means that, though the extension is generally mocking the over-reaction against the idea of over-analysis by people that dogmatically claim that no message should be allowed to be derived from their treats.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

I think it’s funny when people explain it using examples where the author legitimately did have well-documented cultural associations with certain colors. It’d be like in 100 years someone saying “Batman’s suit is dark because he’s supposed to be mysterious and operates in the shadow” and another person responding, “have you ever thought that maybe he just had a dark suit????”

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago

He was the dark knight because his suit was fucking dark! very-intelligent

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

Or also, if the author didn't want to draw attention to the curtains, they wouldn't have mentioned them!

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

So it's used to describe people who over analyze but also people who don't read into media at all (example: the curtains are just blue, and that has no meaning)?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

it might help to think if it like "the curtains are just blue!" being anti-over analysis vs "tHe CuRtAiNs ArE jUSt BlUe!!!" being anti-anti- over analysis

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Hah okay.

It's interesting how language develops. A word can mean something but also the exact opposite of that thing.

this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
235 points (100.0% liked)

games

20952 readers
254 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS