you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 3 years ago (6 children)

At first, I thought it was meant to poke fun at people who over analyze or really reach when discussing literature, but I don't think it means that.

It still means that, though the extension is generally mocking the over-reaction against the idea of over-analysis by people that dogmatically claim that no message should be allowed to be derived from their treats.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    I think it’s funny when people explain it using examples where the author legitimately did have well-documented cultural associations with certain colors. It’d be like in 100 years someone saying “Batman’s suit is dark because he’s supposed to be mysterious and operates in the shadow” and another person responding, “have you ever thought that maybe he just had a dark suit????”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    So it's used to describe people who over analyze but also people who don't read into media at all (example: the curtains are just blue, and that has no meaning)?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments