IrateAnteater comments on SpaceX has to grow 60x in a decade to justify a $1.75 trillion valuation. It's an impossible bar

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 months ago (5 children)

To be fair, you're only a moron if you are considering it a "hold forever" stock. If you get out in time, or even if you miss-time it, that's just gambling, which only makes you a moron if you can't afford the loss.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 8 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

No single stock should be a hold forever play (unless you count ETFs as a single stock)

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

A steady dividend stock might be a hold forever stock. Especially if you don't want to realize the capital gains of the stock's appreciation.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 3 child comments

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's one single stock for one company, there is still high risk of extreme losses over a very long time

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Depends on the company. Some asset heavy companies (think railroads, commercial REITs) pay steady dividends, and are extremely unlikely to just go under without warning.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

The water utility for my country's capital is a publicly traded company for some reason. The only way they're going out of business is if people stop using water or water stops existing in the area.

That can honestly be considered a forever stock as far as I can tell. Dividends aren't super high but that's because they're constantly saving up half the profit for future infra work.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent