104
Against WHITE women??? (thelemmy.club)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/usa@lemmy.ml
88 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

When you can't attack his policies, attack his character. Works every time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Lol, were you out there claiming the misogynisric reddit comments weren't a bad sign? Got some of your own? Never unpacked maybe?

    Look, when women are crowing about how a guy "never hit them" over tense shit like this, he was being a fence sitter on the subject of beating them, & they were trying to justify the situation to stay alive

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -3 points 2 months ago* (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, man. "The character of elected representatives isn't relevant to how they'll govern" is gonna be a tough sell, man.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    You never know the guy personally, so there's always risk. But Platner and his wife have been honestly adressing all allegations. I'd rather take my chances with someone that supports all the right policies than with someone "safe" that doesn't.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    ... he honestly addressed the nazi tattoo? Cause I saw a politician's response to that, rather than an honest response.

    Listen, people being skeptical about the Blackrock Mercenary with the now-covered nazi tattoo that can speak pretty sounds like a pretty reasonable stance to take

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yes, he honestly addressed the tattoo issue. Dozens of times.

    Here’s one

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=X6ILtfzO6K4&t=24s&pp=2AEYkAIB&ra=m

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I'm not watching a 16min interview for you and your timestamp had nothing to do with the tattoo. Try again

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Definitely. I think people are suggesting we vote for candidates who openly oppose policies we support, rather than folks who openly endorse them.

    Mainstream media has folks fuckin brainwashed.

    They need to stop watching the view, god damn.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Nah, man. I'm saying the character of a person is relevant to their candidacy. There are lots of great progressive and DSA endorsed candidates this cycle. Platner doesn't need to be the guy that every one circles around

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Yea, and the woman who is someone he dated. After they found 13 women he dated, this woman alleging abuse worked for heritage foundation and also founded a group called women for Kavanough the Supreme Court justice so…

    I call bullshit

    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2026/6/5/800050593/community/layers-and-layers-of-irony-platners-accuser-co-founded-ladies-for-kavanaugh/

    And I’m saying you don’t even care about character. Platner has more character than you, that’s a fact.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent