836
Christian man sues employer for forcing him to see a Pride flag on his way into work (www.lgbtqnation.com)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world
284 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Department of Public Works employee Eric Batman claims that having to see a Progress Pride flag flying outside the department’s Alhambra, California, headquarters during the month of June effectively forces him to “celebrate, recognize, and solemnize conduct and actions that he views as sin” in conflict with his sincerely held Christian religious beliefs, according to a lawsuit filed in March by anti-LGBTQ+ evangelical nonprofit the Liberty Counsel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 12 points 4 months ago (6 children)

Agreed. Plus a legal precedent in favor of pride flags, could cut the other way. On principle, I don't want to see hateful sentiment yield a legal victory. In practice, disallowing this kind of expression in government facilities would/should keep MAGA flags and other nonsense far from the same flagpoles. Or at the very least, it could be argued so in a second court case.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah. I generally don't have an objection to pride flags but I could definitely see somebody stretching the same arguments to have a Confederate or MAGA flag (or just Trump's face as he's so fond of putting it on fucking everything)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Why should the law treat these things as the same though? If the law is blind to bigotry then that's a larger problem.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Why should the law treat these things as the same though?

    Good question. I think that the law is going to see a flag on a government flagpole from a "does this represent part of the government or not?" standpoint. In that context, the message the flag sends is irrelevant. In this, and possibly many other cases, it represents a third party that is getting notoriety and support from a government facility. Maybe it's okay if its declared as an official act by someone that has the power to do so, but then it probably won't be a one-off like the flag in the article.

    In truth I freaking love that people put a pride flag in such a prominent place. It represents values that align with basic human dignity and are harmless to everyone. I'm just concerned that it's going to open up a whole can of worms that might make things worse. Then again, things are already pretty bad so clever tactics that exploit loopholes are warranted.

    If the law is blind to bigotry then that’s a larger problem.

    The de-facto environment out there is increasingly so. It is indeed a massive fucking problem.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent