You can mope in your paranoid fantasy all you want; point is if you're going to base your critique or analysis on faulty premises, then that's open to correction, which is what I was doing in that thread that was filled with one faulty premise after another. The majority of Americans can't even tell you what year WW2 started, and 47% of Americans can't EVEN give the "six million" number for the Holocaust, and you want to sit there with a straight face and claim your average American has an encyclopedic knowledge of background Nazi symbology beyond the SS bolts and swastika?

No, that premise is pure echo chamber online leftist delusion shit; the correct premise is Americans by and large are political illiterates by design, who can't identify fascist infiltration and influence even when it's staring them in the face, leading to societal vulnerability to said fascist resurgence. Sorry, but I'm not going to sacrifice that vital insight because you radlib dipshits want to play nazi hunter online

Now the irony is my argument was simply an offhand correction made irrespective of whether Platner knew or not, because the whole time I leaned toward the "He knew" camp but was open to other possibilities that still ended with him being a lame-ass cracker, but apparently that's not good enough for you moralizing ultras who clearly DON'T CARE that you prefer an ultra-Zionist to win a fuckin Senate seat

Are you getting it yet? You are the baddies. Why are you teaming up with team baddy

Did a five year old write this?