you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Around the 2010's, both MS and Google were seen as "noble monopolies". Even if Steam is the better video game distributors, always stand on more than one leg when it comes to buying games.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    MS was anything but lol, they had a swarm of lawsuit dramas over by then. Only Apple glazed MS because they quite literally saved them from bankruptcy which they only did as insurance against a proper antitrust case.

    Google was newer but they also weren't a private company, they were riding silicon valley money to the moon.

    Regardless, Steam is a monopoly but their immediate competitors are the only ones chucking anti competitve measures around like crappy DRM and price lockins.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Other gaming platforms are fully capable of competing with Steam. It's only real edge is that it treats game developers better than any other platform.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments