23
German museum in racism row over partial ban of white people (www.euronews.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/worldnews@kbin.social
107 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The row centres around the exhibition 'This is Colonialism' and the museum's decision to restrict white people from entering a small section of the display

Police officers are gathered in front of the Zeche Zollern museum in Dortmund, the focus of what social networks are describing as a racism scandal.

The row centres around the exhibition 'This is Colonialism' and the museum's decision to restrict white people from entering a small section of the display. For several months now, Saturdays at the museum have been reserved for black people and people of colour to explore a colonialism exhibition

The museum claims the objective is not to be discriminatory, but to reserve a safe space for reflection for non-whites.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 years ago (6 children)

It’s not unavailable to you. You can pick literally any other time but that four hours, like any other well adjusted adult would do.

You would say this, then, about a whites only 4 hours at the same museum, then, right?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    No, as that would be completely ignorant of the contextual reality of the situation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    'Context' is not a 'get-out-of-jail-free' card. Malcolm X's pre-Mecca racism, for example. was far, far less heinous than the racism of the America he lived in due to context - but that does not mean it wasn't bad. Likewise, othering a race with benevolent intent is still, at its core, othering a race of human beings.

    And in any case, the point is meant to refute the idea that "you can pick literally any other time". That you can pick another time does not mean that the circumstances which force you to do so are right. Even if you still think it is correct to continue this practice, that "It's only 4 hours" is not a valid argument regarding whether the principle of the thing is moral or not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Do you also consider affirmative action racism? Is women's sports blocking male competitors misandry?

    There's a world where this could be racist, but it's not the one we live in yet.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    Do you also consider affirmative action racism?

    No

    Is women’s sports blocking male competitors misandry?

    Misandry is a strong word for it, but I would say it's not ideal. Of course, there's also the broader issue of the most physical sports being, by their nature, a discriminatory (in the most literal, not moral, sense of the word) endeavor, from weight to height to genetics, and since I'm not a big sports person to begin with, I try not to have strong opinions on the subject.

    I do have strong opinions on non-physical sports with separate women's divisions, and especially those which bar women from participating in non-women's divisions.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent