234
submitted 15 hours ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] omzwo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I'll just say that assuming this policy excludes vulnerability/pen testing like Mozilla with Mythos then this is seriously going to be an extremely naive PR (public relations) only move. Obviously actual programmers not bot laziness for coding is essential for software people rely on and I get allowing vibe coding also destroys programmer (and general LLM user's) brains but to keep up with our now LLM real world reality you need to be realistic not just virtue signalling for purity.

[-] Badabinski@kbin.earth 3 points 3 hours ago

Nah, it's really not necessary. I'm senior dev at a large software company you've absolutely heard of and I'm just as productive as my colleagues who use LLMs. My tasks usually take fewer PRs as well, since there are fewer bugs that need to be fixed.

I still don't understand why people are foaming at the mouth about LLMs. They're fucking awful at writing software.

this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
234 points (99.2% liked)

Linux

13811 readers
487 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS