▲ 262 ▼ UN adds Israel and Russia to blacklist for sexual violence in conflict (www.theguardian.com) submitted 3 months ago by throws_lemy@reddthat.com to c/world@lemmy.world 15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago (5 children) Can someone explain "blacklist" here? Are other nations allowed to do this shit? permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago There isn't really anything stopping them from doing it, just like the us bombing people in boats, its not legal, but who's gonna stop them? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 months ago The report is linked in the article. It's an annual report of the Secretary General to the Security Council. permalink fedilink source parent [–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 7 points 3 months ago* No, it means that every country found to do sanctioned and systematic sexual violence is on the blacklist. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Yeah, the article seems to skip explaining what the blacklist is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0x0@infosec.pub 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) Since its a UN list, it is literally just a list, no penalty, just a naughty list. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago Yeah. It seems to be a list rather than a blacklist. But because it names and shames it makes it easier for public sentiment to change and maybe some on-the-fence parties to come off it. It’s breadcrumbs, but I’ll take it. permalink fedilink source parent [+] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world -9 points 3 months ago (1 child) I assume it means that they lose some privileges or they can’t send troops to be part of UN forces. Also, I’ve heard little of Russian war crimes, to the extent there are any. Israel in the other hand has publicly admitted to systemic sexual abuse of prisoners, including using dogs to carry out rapes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] amanda@aggregatet.org 17 points 3 months ago It’s listed in the article if you read it, and I’ve seen multiple reports. There are also credible reports of other human rights violations around the invasion of Ukraine. I don’t know whose water you’re carrying here or if this is some campist crap. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago There isn't really anything stopping them from doing it, just like the us bombing people in boats, its not legal, but who's gonna stop them? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Telemachus93@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 months ago The report is linked in the article. It's an annual report of the Secretary General to the Security Council. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 7 points 3 months ago* No, it means that every country found to do sanctioned and systematic sexual violence is on the blacklist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) Yeah, the article seems to skip explaining what the blacklist is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 0x0@infosec.pub 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) Since its a UN list, it is literally just a list, no penalty, just a naughty list. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago Yeah. It seems to be a list rather than a blacklist. But because it names and shames it makes it easier for public sentiment to change and maybe some on-the-fence parties to come off it. It’s breadcrumbs, but I’ll take it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 6 points 3 months ago (1 child) Since its a UN list, it is literally just a list, no penalty, just a naughty list. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago Yeah. It seems to be a list rather than a blacklist. But because it names and shames it makes it easier for public sentiment to change and maybe some on-the-fence parties to come off it. It’s breadcrumbs, but I’ll take it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago Yeah. It seems to be a list rather than a blacklist. But because it names and shames it makes it easier for public sentiment to change and maybe some on-the-fence parties to come off it. It’s breadcrumbs, but I’ll take it. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world -9 points 3 months ago (1 child) I assume it means that they lose some privileges or they can’t send troops to be part of UN forces. Also, I’ve heard little of Russian war crimes, to the extent there are any. Israel in the other hand has publicly admitted to systemic sexual abuse of prisoners, including using dogs to carry out rapes. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] amanda@aggregatet.org 17 points 3 months ago It’s listed in the article if you read it, and I’ve seen multiple reports. There are also credible reports of other human rights violations around the invasion of Ukraine. I don’t know whose water you’re carrying here or if this is some campist crap. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] amanda@aggregatet.org 17 points 3 months ago It’s listed in the article if you read it, and I’ve seen multiple reports. There are also credible reports of other human rights violations around the invasion of Ukraine. I don’t know whose water you’re carrying here or if this is some campist crap. permalink fedilink source parent