228
AmERikkKa hElpS peOplE (thelemmy.club)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Azzu@leminal.space 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Well, it's understandable how I could not understand it though, isn't it? They could have also said "people without work" instead of "without the ability to work", no? Then it would have been clear that someone that loses their job, but still has the ability to work, is included. The way they phrased it very much sounded like you're fucked if you have the ability to work, but just don't have a job right now for some other reason.

[-] tocopherol@hexbear.net 1 points 30 minutes ago

If that was the only "without" then yeah but just before that they say "without livelihood source" which means a job or income of some type.

this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
228 points (98.7% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14375 readers
731 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS