you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 4 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    How would you even know about this? What are you, some kinda nerd?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    It makes it to the news before. The HDMI forum is understandably upset by that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    GPMI is not any better with all its "security" functions. It's security against the user, the american way but in chinese flavour.

    it also does not sound to be good idea to have high power delivery so near to normal signal wires, noise, shorts, more power strain on the graphics hardware, and all that.

    displayport for the win.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    Might be a stupid question but why not displayport instead?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Bigger power delivery spec. The hope is that it should be possible to drive a huge display from a single cable for data and power

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    it sounds stupid to force through the computer a meaningful amount of energy that is only intended for a peripheral

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    By your logic type PD spec is stupid because it is also used in PC. The use cases extend beyond PC. Think video wall system where cabling can be messy and pretty much everyone got their own standard. This would allow a single daisy chain and simpler cabling.

  • source
  • parent