▲ 618 ▼ Dog shoots woman with shotgun at Nebraska convenience store (www.theguardian.com) submitted 3 months ago by abacabadabacaba@infosec.pub to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world 221 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 41 points 3 months ago (3 children) basic firearm safety. which no one enforces or even checks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 months ago* (1 child) Well that’s the thing I’m trying to say. It shouldn't need to be enforced or checked (but yes, i support legislation) any more than putting pants on before going outside. But clearly, it’s fairly common behaviour to ignore basic rules. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery 21 points 3 months ago* It shouldn't need to be enforced or checked any more than putting pants on before going outside. You get fined and put on a list if you go donaldducking around. Saying that is a bit like expecting politicians won't be corrupt bcs of some decency & not because of consequences. We pay taxes to get such things sorted out for us, so we don't have to assemble French street furniture every few years. (But I'm not exactly saying I know how to police dog gun safety habits.) permalink fedilink source parent [–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 3 months ago Not in the states at least. I assure you in real nations you will get at the very least a smack upside the head for this level of stupidity. permalink fedilink source parent [–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) ShaLl nOt bE iNfrInGeD – idiots permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) I believe the government should have carte blanche to simply bypass constituonal rights that I deem inconvenient rather than following the established process to change them -- bootlicking authoritarian idiots permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 months ago* (1 child) Well that’s the thing I’m trying to say. It shouldn't need to be enforced or checked (but yes, i support legislation) any more than putting pants on before going outside. But clearly, it’s fairly common behaviour to ignore basic rules. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Evil_Shrubbery 21 points 3 months ago* It shouldn't need to be enforced or checked any more than putting pants on before going outside. You get fined and put on a list if you go donaldducking around. Saying that is a bit like expecting politicians won't be corrupt bcs of some decency & not because of consequences. We pay taxes to get such things sorted out for us, so we don't have to assemble French street furniture every few years. (But I'm not exactly saying I know how to police dog gun safety habits.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Evil_Shrubbery 21 points 3 months ago* It shouldn't need to be enforced or checked any more than putting pants on before going outside. You get fined and put on a list if you go donaldducking around. Saying that is a bit like expecting politicians won't be corrupt bcs of some decency & not because of consequences. We pay taxes to get such things sorted out for us, so we don't have to assemble French street furniture every few years. (But I'm not exactly saying I know how to police dog gun safety habits.) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 3 months ago Not in the states at least. I assure you in real nations you will get at the very least a smack upside the head for this level of stupidity. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 child) ShaLl nOt bE iNfrInGeD – idiots permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) I believe the government should have carte blanche to simply bypass constituonal rights that I deem inconvenient rather than following the established process to change them -- bootlicking authoritarian idiots permalink fedilink source parent
[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) I believe the government should have carte blanche to simply bypass constituonal rights that I deem inconvenient rather than following the established process to change them -- bootlicking authoritarian idiots permalink fedilink source parent