30
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
30 points (96.9% liked)
Technology
43001 readers
182 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
So you believe it's okay to not pay the people you hire because Google doesn't pay people who upload videos to Youtube?
Market share isn't relevant here, if a company hires you to do something they pay you for your work. If they don't recoup their costs from the work they hired you to do that's a bad business decision on their part and not a valid reason to not pay you. This is why developed countries have employee rights laws.
"So you believe it's okay to not pay the people you hire because Google doesn't pay people who upload videos to Youtube?"
On an article about employees not getting paid someone commented with the excuse that they're moving "more in line with youtube" where creators don't get paid. Since you apparently disagree with the obvious meaning, how did you interpret that?
I'm saying it sounds like they want to use the payment structure their more successful competitors are using. My beliefs are irrelevant.