▲ 104 ▼ The End of Trans Rights in the UK Is the Start of Democratic Collapse (www.liberalcurrents.com) submitted 3 months ago by okwithmydecay@leminal.space to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk 4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] makingrain@lemmy.world -10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wimopy@feddit.uk 13 points 3 months ago (1 child) If you read the article you'd be aware that that isn't true and is in fact a key point of the argument. To summarise: The UK was trans-inclusive from the late 2000s-ish to about 6 years ago. At that point it started slowly backsliding under the Tories. Then suddenly in the past year or two trans rights have been eroded massively (including through the first veto of a Scottish bill since devolution). Legal precedents have been reinterpreted. It's a violent lurch towards the direction the US went down. And if it can happen to trans rights it can expand to other areas. And to add my own bit at the end: Reform are testing the waters with things like "abortion is murder". The government is heavily policing protests. The election system sucks. I think caution is warranted, this is not what a healthy democracy looks like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] makingrain@lemmy.world -11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wimopy@feddit.uk 6 points 3 months ago You mean "condescending"? Yeah, I get snarky if people don't even engage with what they criticise. Though I guess "condensing" applies, consider the length of the article I tried to summarise in a few sentences. Anyway, I'm not going to answer those questions. The article goes into plenty of detail of how trans rights and healthcare shifted. Read it. You'll still disagree afterwards of course. I don't necessarily fully agree with their narrative, though I do think the government's/Labour's shift in their attitude to trans people is atrocious and a symptom of larger issues. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wimopy@feddit.uk 13 points 3 months ago (1 child) If you read the article you'd be aware that that isn't true and is in fact a key point of the argument. To summarise: The UK was trans-inclusive from the late 2000s-ish to about 6 years ago. At that point it started slowly backsliding under the Tories. Then suddenly in the past year or two trans rights have been eroded massively (including through the first veto of a Scottish bill since devolution). Legal precedents have been reinterpreted. It's a violent lurch towards the direction the US went down. And if it can happen to trans rights it can expand to other areas. And to add my own bit at the end: Reform are testing the waters with things like "abortion is murder". The government is heavily policing protests. The election system sucks. I think caution is warranted, this is not what a healthy democracy looks like. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] makingrain@lemmy.world -11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wimopy@feddit.uk 6 points 3 months ago You mean "condescending"? Yeah, I get snarky if people don't even engage with what they criticise. Though I guess "condensing" applies, consider the length of the article I tried to summarise in a few sentences. Anyway, I'm not going to answer those questions. The article goes into plenty of detail of how trans rights and healthcare shifted. Read it. You'll still disagree afterwards of course. I don't necessarily fully agree with their narrative, though I do think the government's/Labour's shift in their attitude to trans people is atrocious and a symptom of larger issues. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] makingrain@lemmy.world -11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Wimopy@feddit.uk 6 points 3 months ago You mean "condescending"? Yeah, I get snarky if people don't even engage with what they criticise. Though I guess "condensing" applies, consider the length of the article I tried to summarise in a few sentences. Anyway, I'm not going to answer those questions. The article goes into plenty of detail of how trans rights and healthcare shifted. Read it. You'll still disagree afterwards of course. I don't necessarily fully agree with their narrative, though I do think the government's/Labour's shift in their attitude to trans people is atrocious and a symptom of larger issues. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Wimopy@feddit.uk 6 points 3 months ago You mean "condescending"? Yeah, I get snarky if people don't even engage with what they criticise. Though I guess "condensing" applies, consider the length of the article I tried to summarise in a few sentences. Anyway, I'm not going to answer those questions. The article goes into plenty of detail of how trans rights and healthcare shifted. Read it. You'll still disagree afterwards of course. I don't necessarily fully agree with their narrative, though I do think the government's/Labour's shift in their attitude to trans people is atrocious and a symptom of larger issues. permalink fedilink source parent