this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023

132 points (93.4% liked)

Starfield

starfield@lemmy.zip

3,062 readers

2 active

1 user here now

Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!

Follow instance rules (no spam, keep it civil and respectful, be constructive, tag NSFW)

Helpful links:

Spoiler policy:

No spoilers in titles; if you want to share images with spoilers, preferably post the image in the body of the post. If you do make an image post, mark it NSFW.
Add [Spoilers] to your title if there will be untagged spoilers in the post.
Game mechanics and general discoveries (ship parts, weapons, etc) don't need a spoiler tag.
Details about questlines and other story related content are spoilers. Use your best judgement!

Post & comment spoiler syntax:

&lt;spoiler here>

founded 3 years ago

moderators

Demigodrick@lemmy.zip

Some of Starfield’s planets are meant to be empty by design - but that’s not boring, Bethesda insists (www.rockpapershotgun.com)

submitted 3 years ago by costalfy@programming.dev to c/starfield@lemmy.zip

129 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] zeusbottom@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 years ago (2 children)

When they said this would be hard sci-fi, I actually imagined myself piloting an actual space ship and doing astronaut things

So, KSP 1&2 then? :)

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] riceandbeans161@discuss.tchncs.de 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

or Elite Dangerous

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] zeusbottom@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago

No orbital mechanics in E:D, no in-space EVA. It does have a slightly more realistic flight model with dampening off, but it’s not true to life.

parent