you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Wether you plan to live there or not in 30 years is irrelevant to the situation.

Your tenant pay over half the mortgage. So you get a subsidized housing, keep the appreciated value of the duplex as well and all that for the basic maintenance of the property?

Golly, what a deal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I think they're not considering how the portion of rent that only goes toward the mortgage is still profit despite it not being accessible until the home is sold or a loan taken against its equity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago

    It's absolutely relevant if you know how a mortgage works. Payments are ~75% interest in the first decade. I'm not going to have enough equity at that time to make a profit after all the money I put into the house. I'm looking at a $50k loss if the market stays steady. Still cheaper than renting, though.

    Yes, my tenant subsidizes my living costs. That's the point of a duplex. I set the rent at what I thought was fair, given my expected losses and the work I put in.

    There's no shortage of housing here. If my tenant wanted to, he could buy a house right now. He's waiting until he retires, specifically because he doesn't want the responsibilities of home ownership while he's still working.

  • source
  • parent