you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's not a bad idea to have energy production near where the energy is being used.

That said, it's not an either or.

Technology Connections actually did a great video on why using solar panels in place of crops can benefit the crops and actually provides more energy than the crops themselves. At least in the U.S., a huge portion of our crops are used for ethanol in gasoline anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    So anything that needs energy should have its own energy supply near where the energy is being used on the body as a design principle?

    Sounds good.

    Sounds even better than the (relatively) mere incremental improvement in batteries from donut labs.

    Even if only painting everything [that needs some electricity] with photovoltaic paint.

  • source
  • parent