56
submitted 3 days ago by Zapados@sh.itjust.works to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Prathas@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

I had no idea that this was a right-wing movement so I'm not defending them at all, but... even if the "bait" didn't go through "proper" channels, isn't the publicity crippling them socially good enough?

it may be able to be argued that if this person did not present themselves as a willing child to begin with that the perpetrator may have never attempted to pursue such a crime.

But... they could've still chosen to say "no"...

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Is it socially crippling? I mean you can still run for president an win so... Idk about that one chief.

[-] Prathas@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

lol, well, you've gotta start with a filthy-rich inheritance first for that one!

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Definitely, but sadly it's his lawyers job to argue things like this to protect their client. It also means a jury has to buy it, which they probably won't if this is actually allowed to be used as evidence.

I would hope publicly crippling them would be enough, but I'd rather they get actual justice.

this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
56 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2139 readers
859 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS