423
submitted 2 months ago by Lisk91@sh.itjust.works to c/linux@lemmy.world

The coordinated effort worked. When lawmakers finalized Colorado SB26-051, they added Section 6-30-105(e) to the text. This specific clause waives compliance for operating systems and applications distributed under licenses that allow copying, modifying, and redistributing without platform-imposed technical restrictions. Why the Section 6-30-105(e) Exemption Protects Decentralized Tech

This exemption establishes a formal legislative precedent for the tech industry. It legally shields free and open-source operating systems from hardware-level age attestation laws that closed ecosystems like iOS and Windows will soon have to follow.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 149 points 2 months ago

It's unenforceable on Linux. A Linux user can simply remove or modify any code running on their machine. Fedora, Debian, and Arch can't make a user verify their age any more than they can force you to use Gnome. It's kinda the whole point of FOSS.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

There is a very easy way to force linux users to enforce this. However, I won't give it away here, because as far as I can tell the current law makers are clueless.

And I don't want to give them clues.

[-] potatoguy@mbin.potato-guy.space 28 points 2 months ago

I'm already seeing that in a year or two, we're getting blocked on websites or electron applications because of age verification just like in android with Google Play Services. Like use age verification software or get blocked for 99% the internet.

They don't even need to turn it into law.

[-] Coldcell@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 months ago

Honestly the faster they try to lock us out of the web the sooner we can get a second, freer web with card games and prostitution.

[-] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago

So just like the old net before Google, Meta and Amazon :)

[-] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"Like putting too much air in a balloon!"

[-] quips@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

Blackjack and hookers for 500 please

[-] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago

Whatever device based verification those websites or electron apps were communicating with can be spoofed in a system where you have complete control.

Games are cracked in weeks at most, don't you think that whatever secure communication is established won't be cracked lightning fast by the whole FOSS community? Once the "secure communication" between local apps is broken, a third package can mitm that shit easily. It's a local environment.

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 months ago

Our current law makers are still debating if freeing the slaves was a good idea. That's how far behind they are.

[-] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 6 points 2 months ago

Behind or ahead? Maybe we shouldn't respect the laws they make?

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

I am very glad that you have strategically selected which parts of your mind to lose.

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

I'm going to argue that you share it because one thing you can count on is very determined nerds to defeat it.

Every time legislators tried to enforce some sort of dystopian thing, developers saw it as damage and routed around it.

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

You're not wrong, security through obscurity eventually fails. In this case however, time counts, the longer it can be cut off, the more chance of some sanity returning, of backlash building politically. The time to route around is after a law is made, preferably as flawed a law as possible.

[-] nullify3112@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

My fellow lemming, your lawmakers are not on here don’t worry.

[-] kotsune@ani.social 1 points 2 months ago

I don’t see any real way, unless they’re going to require age verification to connect to the internet in the first place.

[-] bhamlin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

And that's the whole point of the amendment to that law. Their congress critters were enlightened on the futility of such an endeavor. Next is California.

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago

but systemd has dooomed us all

waaaaaahh!

[-] fushuan@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Are you referring to the userd field? That would mean nothing if the user has total control on what can be written there.

this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
423 points (99.5% liked)

Linux

18414 readers
22 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.

  2. Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.

  3. Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.

  4. No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.

  5. No NSFW adult content

  6. Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS