this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
86 points (100.0% liked)

chat

8185 readers
247 users here now

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Anybody want to commiserate on something that sucks?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (5 children)

My go-to rant is that I hate it when historical dramas have fashionable, modern haircuts. I get it, Brother Bumbledorf of the Footsnifferian Monastery would look like shit with a tonsure, but if you want me to take your show seriously you can't have a ship full of fashion models with the same undercut the guy at the fancy burger place has landing in Northbumblia to sack the village and expect me to go "oh no vikings".

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine pulling off a tonsure though. That would be career-defining

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Brother Bumbledorf - tonsured, lightly oiled, and absolutely shredded panting

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Watch Braveheart and spend 2 hours wondering how they all had perfectly bleached white teeth.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no smoking or high sugar intake, along with a low life expectancy, their teeth would generally be better than poor folks' are now. and they had various treatments and stuff for tooth care, it just wasn't very good.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I don't doubt it, but we're talking pearly and immaculate; like a brand new toilet bowl. Lol

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It makes it especially infuriating when the only complaints around historical accuracy come about with the introduction of black people, women (outside of normative roles), or LGBTQ themes.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Even non-CHUD bait historical inquiries don't bother me all that much if they serve the plot, it's just that the clear visual anachronism pisses me off. It'd be like a biopic of Lenin with a Ford F150 in the background.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good point. It's jarring seeing modern aesthetics in a historical setting. I had that with seeing bright colors or designs on clothing/armor

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Depending on the era, outright garish clothes with big codpieces and the like would actually be historically accurate compared to grimdark quasi-medieval aesthetics.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The storming of the Winter Palace with a BattleTech Marauder in the background, an edit that accidentally got included in a textbook, was awesome at least.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Lenin on a Hilux would be more like it!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That P R E S T I G E T V Viking show was a non-starter for me because of those ridiculous modern haircuts and beard combos. yes-chad farquaad-point

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was the most egregious example but The Tudors did it too.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I'm glad I skipped that one too. blob-no-thoughts

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

they should be wearing helmets and hats! the north sea is cold and raiding is dangerous!