this post was submitted on 10 May 2026

90 points (93.3% liked)

Asklemmy

asklemmy@lemmy.ml

55,519 readers

3,374 active

478 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~~Icon~~ by ~~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~~

founded 7 years ago

moderators

mekhos@lemmy.ml

14specks@lemmy.ml

Do you think there would be less conflict in the world if the average intelligence went up 50%? (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

The reason it’s in ~~Republicans~~ the duopoly’s best interest to keep people stupid is that stupid people are much easier to propagandize to.

FTFY

parent