146
Both Fedora and Ubuntu will get AI support – soon (www.theregister.com)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Both Ubuntu and Fedora have made it official: support is coming soon for running local generative AI instances.

An epic and still-growing thread in the Fedora forums states one of the goals for the next version: the Fedora AI Developer Desktop Objective. It is causing some discontent, and at least one Fedora contributor, SUSE’s Fernando Mancera, has resigned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Using an llm mondel that isn't super advanced is actually quite freeing in my opinion, the generated output is always mediocre at best, but it's usually good enough for boilerplate and can be decent if you need to unstuck yourself. It also isn't good enough to lull you into just letting the llm do all the work for you since it makes obvious mistakes.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [+] 11 points 4 months ago (6 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    I mean, it sounds like a tool they occasionally find useful and don't use otherwise. I'm not sure how "occasionally use a tool good enough for my purposes" is a waste. Whether it's the most efficient application of that electricity is a different question, but without knowing their particular scenarios I can't really compare whether other tools use less electricity for the same purpose.

    (Yes, of course, "just do it all in your brain" is even more efficient, but if that's an argument against utilities, you probably shouldn't waste electricity on Lemmy either)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [+] 0 points 4 months ago* (4 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    If I have a tool that consumes resources whether I use it or not

    They were talking about a locally hosted LLM, weren't they? In that case, I'd be pretty confident in saying it eats resources if and when you use it, not all the time.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [+] 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Mind: I'm not the person running the local model.

    but if there are dramatically more efficient tools that cover the same needs, you could be way more efficient (less wasteful) than you are

    I did say that the efficiency would be a different question neither of us can answer in this case, but I fully agree with you. I merely pointed out that a local model wouldn't be a permanent waste of electricity.

    occupying (wasting) space

    That's relative to how much space you have. I also have games on my disk that I haven't played in a while, so they're more or less wasted space. But they're not particularly large, so I can spare a few GB for them, and if I do want to play them, I can jump in spontaneously.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Well I'm usually using these models to prettify matlab figures, it's something that I can do but would take me a while, using an llm it takes a minute or two and gives a good enough result. The llms regression to the mean is also exactly what I want. I want a legible figure. I'd say that the electricity that the llm uses is less than the beefy consumed by me burning food to actually write the thing myself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent