you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

They didn't vote for parties. Elections happened at a local level where people knew candidates personally. Elected local councils ('soviets') would then elect members to higher councils in a 'tiered' system, all the way up to the supreme soviet.

A good-faith criticism of this model might be that it has a high degree of inertia, in that it may respond slowly to sudden changes in popular opinion.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    So the Bolsheviks weren't the dominant party that eliminated all the others after they won the Civil War?

    And remind me what happened to public figures who spoke against the premier in any way? I'm sure nobody complained because they loved the government so much that they'd never say a bad word about it...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yes, that's right. The point I'm making is that elections worked very differently to the party politics people are used to, with an emphasis on people personally knowing their representatives. To the average voter, the bolshevik party wasn't very relevant when they were choosing between two guys who lived on their street.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    And what happened when those representatives disagreed with the inner circle?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    They in turn elected candidates to put forth their disagreement

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Again, what happened to high-ranking politicians who openly expressed disagreement with the premier and his cabinet?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I think, there were some more events, and maybe they involved elections, too. And after that all the other parties were eliminated, because it turned out that it's easier to rule when there's no other options

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Because eliminating representatives who might disagree with you is much more democratic than allowing a multiple party system.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments