▲ 126 ▼ ICANN is Accepting Suggestions for new TLDs (for $227k) - what would you pick? (www.theregister.com) submitted 4 months ago by tinfoilhat@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world 98 comments fedilink hide all child comments Do you have ideas for TLDs? Here's some of mine, not sure if any of these exist already: .plus .now .ent (short for enterprise) .one .er (for domain hacks, don't get any ideas) .db .source
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 months ago (4 children) .agpl only for agpl compatible software permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago (3 children) Actually, you’re on to something there; have the TLD represent the license agreement to access ANYTHING served over it. .gpl .lgpl .agpl .mpl .mit .bsd .apache .epl .cddl .cc0 .ccby .ccbysa .ccbynd .ccbync .ccbyncsa .ccbyncnd permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago (2 children) .cc already exists permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 child) Good luck restricting it for this purpose… but as you’ll see, there isn’t actually a creative commons license that is just “CC” anyway, so that wouldn’t be an issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mschae@discuss.mschae23.de 3 points 4 months ago Could use subdomains to specify it further, like v4.bysa.cc for all CC BY-SA 4.0 works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago (3 children) Actually, you’re on to something there; have the TLD represent the license agreement to access ANYTHING served over it. .gpl .lgpl .agpl .mpl .mit .bsd .apache .epl .cddl .cc0 .ccby .ccbysa .ccbynd .ccbync .ccbyncsa .ccbyncnd permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago (2 children) .cc already exists permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 child) Good luck restricting it for this purpose… but as you’ll see, there isn’t actually a creative commons license that is just “CC” anyway, so that wouldn’t be an issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mschae@discuss.mschae23.de 3 points 4 months ago Could use subdomains to specify it further, like v4.bysa.cc for all CC BY-SA 4.0 works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 months ago (2 children) .cc already exists permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 child) Good luck restricting it for this purpose… but as you’ll see, there isn’t actually a creative commons license that is just “CC” anyway, so that wouldn’t be an issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mschae@discuss.mschae23.de 3 points 4 months ago Could use subdomains to specify it further, like v4.bysa.cc for all CC BY-SA 4.0 works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 child) Good luck restricting it for this purpose… but as you’ll see, there isn’t actually a creative commons license that is just “CC” anyway, so that wouldn’t be an issue. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] mschae@discuss.mschae23.de 3 points 4 months ago Could use subdomains to specify it further, like v4.bysa.cc for all CC BY-SA 4.0 works permalink fedilink source parent
[–] mschae@discuss.mschae23.de 3 points 4 months ago Could use subdomains to specify it further, like v4.bysa.cc for all CC BY-SA 4.0 works permalink fedilink source parent